One of the identifying features of a disinfo agent is that he will promote others "in the circle" and fail to ever refer you to authentic researchers. It can be very, very difficult to detect this unless you already know this pattern and have some provisional idea who is also controlled op and who is not.
So halfway into the first paragraph past the French Revolution stuff (which was another op, it turns out), we find Malone referring us to the work of Mattias Desmet. It turns out that Desmet is not controlled op per se, but a more subtle variation.
That is, Desmet is authentic in his beliefs, but he's off target in important ways. They can let him speak freely--and even promote him--because he ultimately leads people away from the truth, and no part of the truth that he exposes is considered too damaging. Being authentic, if he ever actually gets too close to the truth... poof! all promotion would end and censorship would begin.
"They" are sophisticated and experienced players, and we each must be prepared to match their level.
Man, you fucking rock! You're probably my favorite user here. I feel the same as you in most areas. I haven't done the looking up to find out about this referred to doctor, ill take your word for it, but Malone (or anyone reallly) is still ALIVE and lots of people wirh similar views on these things ARE NOT. That's the best way to tell if someone is disinfo. Are they alive to defend this accusation. If so, they ARE disinfo.
Desmet is the guy that came up with "mass formation psychosis" as the explanation for how people were behaving with all the COVID hysteria. When that idea hit, it was so incredibly heavily promoted over on r/conspiracy it was insane. But even as suspicious and paranoid as I have learned to be, that didn't tip me off.
From the little I heard it seemed plausible enough and I thought, "Well, I guess that guy's just really on to something." Then when I finally got around to listening to a full interview it was nothing I knew much about--crowd psychology stuff--but it seemed pretty reasonable. It took like 50 minutes to get the the key questions.
The interviewer asked, "So what causes it?" Desmet's answer was like, "There are these 4 conditions, and whenever you happen to get those you get mass formation psychosis." Then he was asked, "How do we stop it?" Desmet answered, "Oh, it just goes away by itself after a while."
Yep, that was it: things like the COVID madness just happen all by themselves and there's nothing to do about them. No one is engineering society and it can't be avoided or stopped, No wonder they promoted his ideas.
[[[TPTB]]] have always needed an anti-MSM narrative that [[[they]]] control to attract contrarians/conspiracy acknowledgists. [[[TPTB]]] WANT to stir up division but they need to control it and remain informed what the zeitgist is among the independent minded/more discerning. Trump played/is playing a similar role.
The covid plandemic and the vax mRNA gene therapies were always intended to be proven not-dire or outright fraudulent. If Mallone was saying something the globohomo didn't want us to hear, he'd have been killed or imprisoned.
I often wonder whether these people are controlled opposition or if they are something much worse, people that come across as trust worthy to us to get us to do things that the power elite want us to do, like take ivermectin, not take vaccines, etc. Don't get me wrong, even if the vaccines were gonna save us from something that the power elite we're going to release in the future, I would never take them; but, I often wonder about this.
Well, i think people in power/with money have different views on the way shit should be, just like everyone else. They are all worlkng toward the same GENERAL SURVEILLANCE STATE BULLSHIT, but there is a lot of other stuff those big ballin toddler fuckers DON'T agree on. That's what you're talking about. Maybe controlled opposition doesn't work for the same boss?
I'd say he's definitely "controlled opposition".
One of the identifying features of a disinfo agent is that he will promote others "in the circle" and fail to ever refer you to authentic researchers. It can be very, very difficult to detect this unless you already know this pattern and have some provisional idea who is also controlled op and who is not.
So halfway into the first paragraph past the French Revolution stuff (which was another op, it turns out), we find Malone referring us to the work of Mattias Desmet. It turns out that Desmet is not controlled op per se, but a more subtle variation.
That is, Desmet is authentic in his beliefs, but he's off target in important ways. They can let him speak freely--and even promote him--because he ultimately leads people away from the truth, and no part of the truth that he exposes is considered too damaging. Being authentic, if he ever actually gets too close to the truth... poof! all promotion would end and censorship would begin.
"They" are sophisticated and experienced players, and we each must be prepared to match their level.
Man, you fucking rock! You're probably my favorite user here. I feel the same as you in most areas. I haven't done the looking up to find out about this referred to doctor, ill take your word for it, but Malone (or anyone reallly) is still ALIVE and lots of people wirh similar views on these things ARE NOT. That's the best way to tell if someone is disinfo. Are they alive to defend this accusation. If so, they ARE disinfo.
Desmet is the guy that came up with "mass formation psychosis" as the explanation for how people were behaving with all the COVID hysteria. When that idea hit, it was so incredibly heavily promoted over on r/conspiracy it was insane. But even as suspicious and paranoid as I have learned to be, that didn't tip me off.
From the little I heard it seemed plausible enough and I thought, "Well, I guess that guy's just really on to something." Then when I finally got around to listening to a full interview it was nothing I knew much about--crowd psychology stuff--but it seemed pretty reasonable. It took like 50 minutes to get the the key questions.
The interviewer asked, "So what causes it?" Desmet's answer was like, "There are these 4 conditions, and whenever you happen to get those you get mass formation psychosis." Then he was asked, "How do we stop it?" Desmet answered, "Oh, it just goes away by itself after a while."
Yep, that was it: things like the COVID madness just happen all by themselves and there's nothing to do about them. No one is engineering society and it can't be avoided or stopped, No wonder they promoted his ideas.
he's controlled but believes he's his own person.
[[[TPTB]]] have always needed an anti-MSM narrative that [[[they]]] control to attract contrarians/conspiracy acknowledgists. [[[TPTB]]] WANT to stir up division but they need to control it and remain informed what the zeitgist is among the independent minded/more discerning. Trump played/is playing a similar role.
The covid plandemic and the
vaxmRNA gene therapies were always intended to be proven not-dire or outright fraudulent. If Mallone was saying something the globohomo didn't want us to hear, he'd have been killed or imprisoned.I often wonder whether these people are controlled opposition or if they are something much worse, people that come across as trust worthy to us to get us to do things that the power elite want us to do, like take ivermectin, not take vaccines, etc. Don't get me wrong, even if the vaccines were gonna save us from something that the power elite we're going to release in the future, I would never take them; but, I often wonder about this.
Well, i think people in power/with money have different views on the way shit should be, just like everyone else. They are all worlkng toward the same GENERAL SURVEILLANCE STATE BULLSHIT, but there is a lot of other stuff those big ballin toddler fuckers DON'T agree on. That's what you're talking about. Maybe controlled opposition doesn't work for the same boss?