Thinking ahead, if sex with children becomes okay, what are they going to push after that? Full on rape’s okay? Before the line was at “don’t wear short skirts.” Now we’re at “some people just want to have sex with children, that’s okay.”
I guess animal rape is next. Makes sense since it’s already a fetish thing. And with that, that’s all the living creatures on the planet. You’d be allowed to have sex with all of them. Necrophilia would be after that. Digging up folks to rape.
From there I guess locations could come into play. Making public sex okay. Raping dead animals in public would be legal.
20 years ago if someone told me letting girls wear short skirts would lead to where we are now, I’d have thought that was ridiculous, so with that in mind, I wouldn’t doubt the above could happen within 20 years if there’s no militant push back.
this isn't an extension of short skirts, and they go back way farther than 20years.
If anything all clothing is the evil as it is what makes nudity sexual. Nudity is the natural state, and is not sexualized in nudist colonies and cultures the way it is amongst the clothed. Thus the most evil person in all of existence would be the inventor of clothing? They are responsible for every rape, every impure thought ever provoked by exposed skin...
If your morals come from religion, why would god create us naked if it is wrong?
if you blame the woman for wearing the short skirt, is the man not accountable for his actions or is he the victim? Then is it wrong to wear a short skirt when you dont get raped?
So the problem with some of the letters in that alphabet is consent. Two adults of the same sex can consent, so there is nothing illegal homosexuality. I believe in freedom, and we can't arbitrarily impose our morals on others. I may disagree with you, but I will fight to death to protect your right to be a huge faggot amongst other consenting adults.
Children and animals cannot consent, so these things are inherently wrong, no moral interpretation necessary. These aren't stages of some slippery slope; they're all just rape.
Clothing doesn’t make nudity sexual, it in part gives us a space to not be sexual in most encounters. Keep reading the creation story if you want that part disproven too.
The point is the endless march towards sexualizing everything, which I gave short skirts as an example of. The point of girls, especially young girls, wearing short skirts is to sexualize them. A greater part of Christianity is reigning in women and sexuality. The line of modesty used to be at skimpy clothing. Pretty soon there will be no line.
I love sex but I’m hard pressed to argue that things weren’t better before Tinder culture.
Thinking ahead, if sex with children becomes okay, what are they going to push after that? Full on rape’s okay? Before the line was at “don’t wear short skirts.” Now we’re at “some people just want to have sex with children, that’s okay.”
I saw they are already pushing for adding a Z to their pervert alphabet. For Zoophilia or in other words beastiality. These people are vile.
I guess animal rape is next. Makes sense since it’s already a fetish thing. And with that, that’s all the living creatures on the planet. You’d be allowed to have sex with all of them. Necrophilia would be after that. Digging up folks to rape.
From there I guess locations could come into play. Making public sex okay. Raping dead animals in public would be legal.
20 years ago if someone told me letting girls wear short skirts would lead to where we are now, I’d have thought that was ridiculous, so with that in mind, I wouldn’t doubt the above could happen within 20 years if there’s no militant push back.
this isn't an extension of short skirts, and they go back way farther than 20years.
If anything all clothing is the evil as it is what makes nudity sexual. Nudity is the natural state, and is not sexualized in nudist colonies and cultures the way it is amongst the clothed. Thus the most evil person in all of existence would be the inventor of clothing? They are responsible for every rape, every impure thought ever provoked by exposed skin...
If your morals come from religion, why would god create us naked if it is wrong?
if you blame the woman for wearing the short skirt, is the man not accountable for his actions or is he the victim? Then is it wrong to wear a short skirt when you dont get raped?
So the problem with some of the letters in that alphabet is consent. Two adults of the same sex can consent, so there is nothing illegal homosexuality. I believe in freedom, and we can't arbitrarily impose our morals on others. I may disagree with you, but I will fight to death to protect your right to be a huge faggot amongst other consenting adults.
Children and animals cannot consent, so these things are inherently wrong, no moral interpretation necessary. These aren't stages of some slippery slope; they're all just rape.
Clothing doesn’t make nudity sexual, it in part gives us a space to not be sexual in most encounters. Keep reading the creation story if you want that part disproven too.
The point is the endless march towards sexualizing everything, which I gave short skirts as an example of. The point of girls, especially young girls, wearing short skirts is to sexualize them. A greater part of Christianity is reigning in women and sexuality. The line of modesty used to be at skimpy clothing. Pretty soon there will be no line.
I love sex but I’m hard pressed to argue that things weren’t better before Tinder culture.