WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane - ergo not destroyed by terrorist attack, which was the insurance deal he got paid out for the towers. I guess he probably tried for the pay out, I didn't ever hear about him getting one though. At least not for "destroyed by terrorist action" or whatever the correct phrase is.
There was a court case where the insurance companies and him argued whether the 9/11 was a single event or multiple events. IIRC it affected the deductible which was either like $500MM or $1B depending upon this outcome.
from the wikipedia page on WTC7
Larry Silverstein got his 4.5B insurance payout. He had to sue, but got it. Of which he said insurance companies hate him for it.
If my memory is correct he upgraded the policy for terror attacks for the entire complex, 7 buildings total.
I want to say the entirety of the complex, save bldg 3. Farthest away.
Bldg 7 on the edge of the complex. Obvious. Coverup.
Dead bldgs tell no tales.
Ahahhahhha...
Are you following the money sinner?
WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane - ergo not destroyed by terrorist attack, which was the insurance deal he got paid out for the towers. I guess he probably tried for the pay out, I didn't ever hear about him getting one though. At least not for "destroyed by terrorist action" or whatever the correct phrase is.
There was a court case where the insurance companies and him argued whether the 9/11 was a single event or multiple events. IIRC it affected the deductible which was either like $500MM or $1B depending upon this outcome.
He got 4.5B. Insurance industry hates him for it.
He said so himself.
Just watched this and it's related https://rumble.com/v1iunqk-larry-silverstein-trump-netanyahu-compilation.html
He took one the lease on July 17th. The "two events" court case wasn't over the deductible but was over getting multiple payouts.