Is Leftism a Mental Disorder?
(www.powerlineblog.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Allow me to give you an example of the combinations available in a choose 100 system. so you pick personality 1, and then you pick personality 3 you mix them together, you are not the same as 1 or 3 you are a combination. So you can pick as many as you want and you can operate them together or separately.
As you can see, tons of combinations are available, but still constrained to some small number (100 is just an example, there is no empirical limit here)
Once you are traveled enough, to have met enough people you will understand this to be fact.
Implying you are highly likely to keep meeting some basic personality features embedded in people, but it does not disclose their entire personality capability.
This is far more complex than you are letting on.
But you have already predetermined what you measure....you may be measuring aggressiveness or perhaps politeness (which itself is subjective) etc.
These traits are themselves the limit on how you classify. Which ultimately comes down to your awareness, and how specific you make the criteria.
You could for example make a personality trait that the people are fans of a particular sport team etc....
Well, you are not really clear yet. For example, you could make a personality trait that includes fans of ball sports. This would be due to the inclination they would have to such framing.
Same as a gear head, someone into cars and mechanical objects.
So, the personality traits we understand are more encompassing than a single end point and the end point selected is likely a function of the social sphere.
So, when it comes to forming and creating personalities in this design its obvious and clear. When we want to compare it to say a illogical or irrational frame of mind, we can look to traits that include the desire to inflict harm on others for example.
This is something that is fairly well proven and because the logic and reasoning components of this particular trait set is not acceptable we can determine it to be a mental disorder.
I think what I am trying to generalize is k-means clustering.....requires you to have measurements to cluster into k groups. Those underlying measurements are what determines the clustering....does that make sense.
Sure, I guess I was just pointing out my feelings on your cluster metrics being too stringent and proposed a more generalized metric that also fits the bill.