I'd integrate with the enemy. Subvert their beliefs taking as much time as needed. I would work to synergize people like me and work to build protectionist systems that would be used to further our agenda using all available tools to subvert those not considered to be of the same origin.
I would produce endless propaganda used to project thought where I want it. People would believe that my group needs special attention and must be saved. We are the ones chosen of god. Surely all lesser humans would be happy to be enslaved by the systems I create.
I would seek to maintain control of resources and exchange means. I would take leadership of all things and form groups of my people everywhere.
Make the first move on other tribes? Yes. Not enough resources to support them. Have to conqueror any local tribes to make sure you're sustainabled and that any resources are managed into a single nation or territory. Otherwise there will be far less resources, and any other surrounding tribes will be plundering your resources and territory for the same reasons.
Not speculating where, the principle is the same inside of competiting tertorities. Sit there you'll be invaded sooner.
It depends on what age of technology we're in, you're stating currrent. You secured your borders. You always attack first if you're able. Today we have nukes, they stop most first strikes. You're stating there was a survival issue in your topic, only enough resources to sustain every 4 out of every 5 people. Proving first strike. You wouldn't sit there, you'd get attacked. You'd only defend if you held all the resources.
If 4/5 of the globe are dying. Not many places to go. But you'd probably want somewhere in the steppes of Asia to survive. Not much in the way of natural disaster outside of the elements, cold, but plenty of natural resources, and wildlife, remote, and above sea level, and away from the major faultlines. But otherwise hostile. But those places can also be found on other Continents. Not quite but are often far more populated or much colder or hotter.
Otherwise your guess. Why are we talking about Russia as that topical comparison, yes it is resource rich and much is very remote. But a history of warfare, attacking, invasion, and defending. There are nukes preventing attacking first. Unless you attack somebody else without them. Haha.
If 4 in 5 people are dying it doesn't matter because somebody else will attack you first. It would be like the Walking Dead, the biggest threat is everybody else.
Done. Moved to the woods. Near a tributary and a lake.
Forested land. Firewood, game.
Self sustainable. Garden, foraging skills, poultry.
Isolated. Far enough away and deep enough in the woods away from any urban area.
Lost my weapons in a boating accident. Wink and a nod.
Knowledge in primitive hunting skills a must.
Debt free. Limited exposure to debt is in FRN holdings.
Not a game to me.
Tribe is as prepared as it can be.
I'd integrate with the enemy. Subvert their beliefs taking as much time as needed. I would work to synergize people like me and work to build protectionist systems that would be used to further our agenda using all available tools to subvert those not considered to be of the same origin.
I would produce endless propaganda used to project thought where I want it. People would believe that my group needs special attention and must be saved. We are the ones chosen of god. Surely all lesser humans would be happy to be enslaved by the systems I create.
I would seek to maintain control of resources and exchange means. I would take leadership of all things and form groups of my people everywhere.
Make the first move on other tribes? Yes. Not enough resources to support them. Have to conqueror any local tribes to make sure you're sustainabled and that any resources are managed into a single nation or territory. Otherwise there will be far less resources, and any other surrounding tribes will be plundering your resources and territory for the same reasons.
Not speculating where, the principle is the same inside of competiting tertorities. Sit there you'll be invaded sooner.
It depends on what age of technology we're in, you're stating currrent. You secured your borders. You always attack first if you're able. Today we have nukes, they stop most first strikes. You're stating there was a survival issue in your topic, only enough resources to sustain every 4 out of every 5 people. Proving first strike. You wouldn't sit there, you'd get attacked. You'd only defend if you held all the resources.
If 4/5 of the globe are dying. Not many places to go. But you'd probably want somewhere in the steppes of Asia to survive. Not much in the way of natural disaster outside of the elements, cold, but plenty of natural resources, and wildlife, remote, and above sea level, and away from the major faultlines. But otherwise hostile. But those places can also be found on other Continents. Not quite but are often far more populated or much colder or hotter.
Otherwise your guess. Why are we talking about Russia as that topical comparison, yes it is resource rich and much is very remote. But a history of warfare, attacking, invasion, and defending. There are nukes preventing attacking first. Unless you attack somebody else without them. Haha.
If 4 in 5 people are dying it doesn't matter because somebody else will attack you first. It would be like the Walking Dead, the biggest threat is everybody else.