at 500 miles, you are saying 100% will be visible?
so... from a tall enough vantage point - empire state building, for example, you can see someone on the shores of the UK -- if only you had a strong enough zoom lens?
is that what you are saying??
like ... someone on the shores of australia could see someone on the shores of alaska... because water always finds a level... if only you had a strong enough zoom lens.
you believe that?
and you also believe there are no satellites
and space doesn't exist.
does the moon exist, or is the moon an illusion?
i'm still trying ti figure out if you guys believe in geometry or not...
If you follow phyics [sic] though, you'd understand that particles would compress to block all light and you couldn't see that far unless your rainbow cube was putting off insanly bright light, like the sun.
sorry... do you believe in physics or not?
again bruv... just trying to understand what part of "science" you all believe is "brainwashing", and what part of science is kosher.
you don't take me serious.
no, the problem is... you are not convincing at all :)
i'm just chatting
but seriously, i think you missed my point.
at 500 miles, i am saying half will be visible.
at 500 miles, you are saying 100% will be visible?
so... from a tall enough vantage point - empire state building, for example, you can see someone on the shores of the UK -- if only you had a strong enough zoom lens?
is that what you are saying??
like ... someone on the shores of australia could see someone on the shores of alaska... because water always finds a level... if only you had a strong enough zoom lens.
you believe that?
and you also believe there are no satellites
and space doesn't exist.
does the moon exist, or is the moon an illusion?
i'm still trying ti figure out if you guys believe in geometry or not...
/science built the internet -- and you're on it
sorry... do you believe in physics or not?
again bruv... just trying to understand what part of "science" you all believe is "brainwashing", and what part of science is kosher.
no, the problem is... you are not convincing at all :)