Everyone of us is focused on bringing truth all around us. The problem is that we do that alone and hope for the comment or post that will eventually lead us to good materials to share.
Still, I believe that there are many different people with different abilities that we can use in a focused attempt to achieve greater accomplishments.
- Do you know how to edit vides?
- Can you make a good picture?
- Can you write a post that is pushing people correctly in the right direction?
- Do you want to have a teammate that is one online message away from helping you?
This is possible. Anyone of you can ask for anything in here or in other places. The point is to be available with your skills. If you want a team that will provide the things they offer, don't you want to be a teammate that provides for the team? This is quite easily possible by only writing down what you need. I will provide it as a representative of the already established team. Then you will question whether this team is worth joining. Probably you can consider that this team doesn't require your actual name, any real details your on, any background information on who you know, etc. But still... it may sound too good to be true. But try it. See where that leads you. Ask and test the ability of this team for your own benefit. Free of charge. As a perfect team should do for the team members.
- Do you want to know about germ theory and be more educated on the topic of viruses and covid?
- Do you want to explore the occult and see the secrets that are hidden there?
- Is politics too hard for you and you wish to have a grand look on the history of the nations, so you can expect their next action?
- Is bitcoin too hard for you to understand and you wish some can summarize that for you and present the problems of such scenario?
- Is economy a hard subject for you to understand next to finances?
- Do you wish for a good documentary, document, or evidence that will clearly explain a topic that you want to uncover?
Then just test this team. Ask anything about any topic you want to research. You would be surprised how many helpful people there are in these hard times.
a) how could there be a "we" in U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"?
b) what if the cause (process of dying) divides into each one (living) within?
c) how can enacting origin (cause) belong (our) to the reactions (choice) within? What if everything within reality already belongs to it?
Every ONE of "us"? What if ONE implies being apart from all other ONEs; while being a part (perceiving) of the whole (perceivable)?
What if the few suggest collectivism (e pluribus unum aka out of many; one) while using suggested umbrellas (us; we; them etc.) to tempts each one to consent to a collective as defined by others. If "we" represent "white"; than why can others define; redefine and contradict what it means to be white?
Isn't the perceivable reality already all around each one perceiving it? Does perceivable reality need to be branded as a suggested truth among those within? Could the conflict of reason (true vs false) exist without the suggestion of "truth"?
What can one bring that isn't already there? Where could one bring it from if not from what's already available? Isn't life itself already being delivered from inception towards death; hence being brought into conscious existence?
BRING, verb - "to procure as a cause"...temporary living implies being the effect; caused by the ongoing process of dying.
...willingly ignoring to be the problem (living) within the solution (process of dying); hence SOLVO (the act of separating the parts) -TION (through action); which implies being the partial reaction within the whole enacting system.
The parasitic few suggest seeking solutions for endless suggested problems; yet the only outcome life can find seeking represents death. The origin of all existence doesn't need to be searched for; it needs to be adapted to; while resisting the temptation to ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggested).
Instead of the conflict between plural (we) and singular (alone); ask yourself if alone represents ALL(in)ONE aka from singular (whole) into plural (partial); yet coexistence of ONEs (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)?
The suggested conflict of reason (want to be part of we vs don't want to be alone) represents the inversion of perceivable (one within oneness aka choice within balance aka perceiving within perceivable aka living within the process of dying).
Hope represents the consent to a suggested outcome; which tempts the living "forwards" towards dying. Meanwhile; consent to fear tempts one to ignore living while focusing on the suggested outcome of dying.
Both hope vs fear represent a) consent to suggested information and b) a rebrand of want vs not want reasoning. Life needs to adapt to being moved (to perceivable inspiration); not hope and fear towards what others suggest lies ahead.
Will represents the choice (living) reacting to the momentum (balance) of what leads (process of dying), and the partial within the whole represent the odds within the even.
EVENT', noun [Latin eventus, evenio; e and venio, to come.]...life already came into being. The events others suggest tempt one right back out of being alive.
a) STILL, verb - "to stop, as motion or agitation; to check or restrain". How about you "check yourself before you wreck yourself" cause being alive implies within constant motion (from inception towards death).
b) I believe represents "I want what another suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable"
Differentiated out of whole; hence being different within the same whole; hence being the partial reaction within the enacting whole.
ACCOM'PLISH, verb - "to complete; to finish entirely"...what's the implication for completing life; for finish living entirely? Meanwhile; your MENT (mind; memory) represents a reaction to enacting input; hence the need for adaptation. The accomplishments others are suggesting (achievements; trophies; social credit; prizes; honors; diplomas; prestige; confirmations etc.) tempts one to ignore the perceivable inspiration which when adapted to would grow the mind and grow comprehension of perceivable exponentially.
Look around you at this moment and show me the greatest accomplishment right now? What but loss has the ignorance of growth accomplished?
What if the suggested captured moment (pictures) and the mimicry of motion (motion pictures) tempt one to ignore KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"?
ED'IT, verb [from Latin edo, to publish; e and do, to give.]...what if everything (perceivable) was already given to every one (perceiving)? Why is it that the parasitic few call themselves publisher (giver); yet only ever take from the ignorant many? Isn't everything the few grow a temptation for the many to lose?
What if the living few suggest dying to the many who ignore living; while hiding it under whatever suggested information the many want to consent to?
What other direction than towards death can there be for life? DIREC (moving forwards) -TION (through action)...living represents the reaction within the direction of dying, and the parasitic few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being "reactors" (living) within a generator (process of dying).
Can one want without ignoring need?
a) TEAM, noun - "two or more horses, oxen or other beasts harnessed together to the same vehicle"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/team There's the cattle (goyim) reference.
b) reality is already provided for everyone within; responding to it grows provisions...unless ignored.
What if each one represents the evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable) aka the highest worth with the opportunity to grow exponentially?
Charge (enacting) sets free will of choice (reacting).
PERFECT (complete) tempts one to ignore being partial (incomplete); hence having the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying).
Why is it that the parasitic few control the flow of suggested information; yet the many, who ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information, think that mimicking the few is gonna help the many?