I see constant, verifiable bits of evidence that disprove each model, yet I see a constant stream of diatribes from each side… sound familiar? Divide and conquer. It's possible that both models are false, completely.
Nobody can deny the fake footage from the ISS, the absolutely fake moon landing, the fake Tesla Roadster in space, the lasers across 20 mile stretches, the zoom ends on boats that should be completely behind the horizon, etc.
And then on the flipside, nobody can deny things like the celestial poles (a post today), the ability to grab a telescope in view another planet, etc.
It's possible we are in a physical simulation of some kind. I think pretending that we know the answer for sure, one way or another, based on bullshit and lies fed to us by the television is just a LARP.
Thoughts?
Debunkers really don't touch why NASA fakes things, do they?
As for the divide and conquer...here's a good quote on historical "flat earth"...
"The myth that people once believed the earth was flat was created by authors such as Draper and Dickson in order to exaggerate the conflict between religion and science." from here
Which is kinda odd, since many of the real scientists were religious back in the day. They still knew that science is limited in many respects as to answering very fundamental questions (like why we exist as you alluded to). But if you can figure out why you exist, you can figure out why everything exists. :)
Why can’t one think that NASA lies AND the Earth is not flat?
Narrative and counter narrative are normally both lies. There are more than two options.
I didn't say one couldn't think that. One can think whatever they want.
I really didn't say anything that warrants that question though. Pretty strange.
And if there is "more than two options", why are you foaming at the mouth to "prove" one?
“Debunkers really don't touch why NASA fakes things, do they?”
Why do they have to? Just because one thinks the flat Earth model is wrong does not mean they think NASA never lies.
“why are you foaming at the mouth to "prove" one?”
When did I ever do that? I never once tried to “prove” one. I simply pointed out that the existence to two celestial poles DISPROVES the flat Earth model. And it does.
So ok, why are you foaming at the mouth to disprove flat earth?
Seems like quite the waste of time.