Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
Debunking the flat Earth model. (media.scored.co)
posted 3 years ago by Turdsoup 3 years ago by Turdsoup +24 / -9
112 comments share
112 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (112)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Turdsoup [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

In the video you sent, at the 18:38 mark, he claims that Octantis is circling the southern rim of the flat Earth. But due to perspective, it converges at one point.

“Even though it is circling across your field of view, it is still going to be converged at one point.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t30-YbayyXE

IF, the SCP circles across to the whole southern rim of the flat Earth, THEN we would see considerable movement throughout the night.

So, show me a time-lapse that shows Octantis (SCP) moving across the field of view. Just one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The SCP converges at one point, due to how perspective works. Octantis will appear to move in a small circle to us, due to how far away it is, as you get closer, it will rise in the night sky. According to the flat earth model, we would not see Octantis move much across the night sky, as it will appear to converge at a single point to us.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Turdsoup [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

“Even though it is circling across your field of view, it is still going to be converged at one point.”

That is not the way he explains it in the video. “Converged at one point,” is in reference to it circling at one point, NOT it being stationary in the sky. He specifically says it will move across your field of view a couple times in the video.

At 17:17 he says,

“Well the stars move around at each other’s night time.” (Actual quote, he talks funny)

That is in reference to how different people looking south at different parts of the equator would see the same stars (but at different times).

The video you presented SPECIFICALLY says the southern stars will move across the field of vision and throughout the night so that people anywhere south of the Equator will see the same stars, but at different times.

If that was true there should be lateral movement throughout the night. That movement would get picked up in time-lapse photography. So, show me the movement.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

He says that even as they physically rotates around the North star, at 12000 miles away from the North star, they will converge at a single point, no matter where on earth you are looking at them, as long as you are looking in a southward direction. That is because of how perspective works, proven by anti crespycular sun rays.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Turdsoup [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

At the 17 minutes mark he specifically says otherwise. Perhaps he is just contradictory.

Stand on railroad tracks and you will experience the same optical illusion as anticrepuscular rays. As the railroad gets further away, it will appear to get less wide and eventually converge at a point. Like a football shape, with the widest part being where you are standing. But in reality, the road is parallel. The same thing happens to the Sun’s rays. The rays are not actually spreading out and then coming back together. They are parallel.

If the Sun’s rays are not parallel, find me ONE example where the observer is not right underneath the widest part. Just like standing on railroad tracks, the perceived widest part is at the observer and it gets narrower in either direction.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy