Debunking the flat Earth model.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (112)
sorted by:
a) the suggested captured moment (picture) and its mimicry of moving (motion picture) tempts one to ignore being at the center (perceiving choice) of momentum (perceivable balance).
b) back then; now and later one exists within the ever changing moment aka the momentum of ongoing (process of dying) from the perspective of the temporary (living) within.
c) the LAPSE, noun [Latin lapsus, from labor, to slide, to fall.] one perceives represents temporary growth (living) being transmuted back into ongoing loss (process of dying).
a) what if one needs to adapt to being moved; while others tempt one to want to measure everything else being moved? Does one need to measure breathing within perceivable or is one tempted by the suggestions of others to measure breathing (put a mask over your nose and mouth)?
What if celestial spirits are suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro.] - "to breathe, to blow". Sounds like adaptation to me.
b) as for the pole...AX'IS, noun - "the straight line passing through a body"...the "line" which passes through the living body represents the motion from inception towards death.
a) a suggested result tempts one to ignore that life represents adaptation to origin; while resisting the temptation of suggested outcomes.
b) RE (response to) CREATE (bring into being from nothing) represents consenting to suggested nothing; while ignoring perceivable everything.
What if the few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything)? Hence being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)?
What if as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form represents inception, form within flow represents life and form to flow represents death. In other words...ingredient (living) transmuted out of base (process of dying) alchemy.
c) try to create a new thought without shaping it out of everything already perceivable...
Will represents free "will" of choice; hence implying to exist at the center of balance aka need (perceivable) or want (suggested). Ignorance represents ones choice to ignore need (perceivable inspiration) for want (suggested information).
Show me "two" things and I will point out that each ONE of them has to exist at a different place for you to be able to perceive them. It's the whole (perceivable) which differentiates into each partial (perceiving).
"two" represents a suggested inversion of perceivable oneness as perceived by each one within. Furthermore; two; three; four etc. implies counting aka DIMENSION, noun - "to measure" aka the choice of ONE to count other ONEs; while branding them as two; three, four etc.
This represents idolatry, and the parasitic few suggested NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" to tempt each ONE of the many to ignore U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". Why? Because if each of the many ignores being ONE with choice; then the parasitic few become the "chosen ones".
How could life, while being moved from inception towards death, "do nothing"; while being done (living) by everything (process of dying)?
If you add a T to NASA you'll get SATAN. Now about that missing T...minus 3;2;1...
a) plane (perceivable); planet (suggested)
b) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMFqkcPYcg "Sweet Dreams are made of these...who am I to disagree?" https://pic8.co/sh/J6ho5s.png
"some of them want to abuse you....some of them want to be abused"... https://pic8.co/sh/x01AMt.png aka chosen ones lying on the flat plane; while letting the goyim (cattle) run circles around them.
Let's also add the official NASA connection.... https://eurythmics-ultimate.com/records/4999-annie-lennox-apollo-13-the-usa-promo-cd-nasa-cd-990013/
c) PROVE, verb [Latin probo.] - "to try to ascertain some unknown". That ignores KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Everything is known (perceivable); each one (perceiving) within lacks comprehension thereof; hence allowing growth (compression) within loss (impressing).