when the establishment of the USoA is clearly a Masonic experiment to propel the agenda?
Don't you think the creators can have their creation back whenevr they feel like?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
a) to believe implies to consent to what another suggests; while ignoring what everyone perceives as free will of choice.
b) suggested SOVEREIGN, adjective - "supreme in power" tempts one to ignore being center (living) within legal power (process of dying), hence the opportunity to grow (life) within loss (inception towards death).
The process of dying sets (establishes) memory (ment) for the living to be able to EX (express; out of) PER (by) MENT (memory; mind). What can one express within loss (dying)? Growth (living)!
"do nothing" (don't) implies restricting thinking within perceivable everything by consent to suggested "nothing".
Neither can those perceiving everything perceivable perceive "nothing"; create anything out of nothing; nor does the cause of EX (out of) ISTENCE (essence) represent nothingness, but energy aka everything as the cause for each thing as the affect within. Only within can one be EX (out of) IST (essence).
Self differentiation of whole into partial represents perceivable transmutation (out of everything); while the parasitic few suggest the inversion thereof aka creationism (out of nothing).