Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

22
Wikispooks is down. Editor thinks for shining light on pedos. (mobile.twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by glownigger8675309 3 years ago by glownigger8675309 +22 / -0
2 comments share
2 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (2)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– glownigger8675309 [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

>Streisand effect

https://burners.me/2019/07/19/tracy-twyman-update/ (info 2 years old?)

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Tracy_Twyman

https://rosamondpress.com/2020/02/17/tracy-twyman-is-dead/

https://burners.me/2019/07/10/another-pedogate-researcher-suddenly-dies-rip-tracy-twyman/

https://nrgiseternal.com/let-s-get-down-dirty/the-mysterious-case-of-tracy-twyman/?PHPSESSID=f0b133aedd105260b9567a1f1171eb77

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMS0uuQVbBs

https://groundzeromedia.org/7-18-19-tracy-twyman-plus-ultra-pergatorium-w-sean-alger-and-sloan-bella/

https://sacredgeometryinternational.com/demon-talk-tracy-twyman-tracy-r-twyman-writes-about-esoteric-history/#!

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Tracy+Twyman&t=brave&ia=web

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– clemaneuverers 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

That's pretty interesting it's the Twyman page he says is responsible. I've actually always been a little surprised they maintain a page on her.

*I have a neutral to low opinion of Wikispooks. It can be pretty biased, shallowly researched, and unjustifiably dismissive on certain topics, once you dig a little deeper. *

it seems I may have been thinking of rational wiki when I wrote this comment rather than wikispooks - ie my opinion of rational wiki is low. Wikispooks seems alright actually

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy