a lengthy anonymous essay posted on an astrophysicists blog written by a software engineer who had worked for NASA — and during a routine trouble-shooting job with the rover, discovered a “backdoor” in the Mars rover’s software that allowed NASA to receive thumbnail images from the rovers “on Mars” allegedly in real time — no time delay, but because of the immense distance between Earth and Mars — this would be a scientific impossibility — as radio transmission faster than the speed of light is an impossibility.
Of course, the software engineer truly believed that the rovers were on Mars — as do most NASA scientists — so the only explanation he could come up with to explain how NASA was receiving these thumbnails in real time was to speculate that NASA had developed some “secret” technology that allowed them to receive these images in real time while failing to apply Occam’s Razor and completely ignoring the simplest — and obvious — explanation that they rovers were on Earth, not Mars.
If you have the time to read the full article written by the astrophysicist, I highly recommend it despite it's semi-novella length. I came across it a couple of years ago and it's a fascinating read. It's a great example of the compartmentalization that prevents even people working on these programs from knowing the whole truth of what they are working on.
What’s interesting to me is that people will believe this one guy, with zero proof, who supposedly left nasa because he got scared after discovering this, but don’t believe the hundreds of people involved with working on or sending the rover to Mars.
I try keep an open mind but believing this guy is akin to believing an unsourced text meme. It simply doesn’t prove anything and isn’t even good evidence of anything, or evidence at all
That’s certainly a fair point but we can both be sort of right. A whistleblower with zero proof simply is what it is.
If you’re familiar with bob lazar, do you believe him? He claims the govt has ufos and alien bodies etc. he provides no more or less evidence than this other guy. He could be telling the truth or could be a crazy liar, there’s simply no way to tell
I find flat earth theories interesting and some of their claims even compelling. But I'm also usually able to find credible evidence debunking it.
Do I believe that the government would lie about the moon landing and even lie about the shape of the planet? Yes
Am I convinced enough to abandon global Earth theory and take up flat earth theory? No. It's frustrating that the debate involves so much name calling and condescending pretentiousness. Both sides should develop scientific experiments people can do on their own that prove the Earth to be a globe or flat.
To me, science is something that can be verified in an experiment. You can verify someone's sexual gender via a test of chromosomes. You cannot test someone's whimsical make believe gender with a scientific method, therefore it's junk and a social construct.
There's another good related article linked at the bottom of that page:
Smoking Gun Proof From NASA Software Engineers That Mars Rovers Are On Earth — Not On Mars
If you have the time to read the full article written by the astrophysicist, I highly recommend it despite it's semi-novella length. I came across it a couple of years ago and it's a fascinating read. It's a great example of the compartmentalization that prevents even people working on these programs from knowing the whole truth of what they are working on.
What’s interesting to me is that people will believe this one guy, with zero proof, who supposedly left nasa because he got scared after discovering this, but don’t believe the hundreds of people involved with working on or sending the rover to Mars.
I try keep an open mind but believing this guy is akin to believing an unsourced text meme. It simply doesn’t prove anything and isn’t even good evidence of anything, or evidence at all
That’s certainly a fair point but we can both be sort of right. A whistleblower with zero proof simply is what it is.
If you’re familiar with bob lazar, do you believe him? He claims the govt has ufos and alien bodies etc. he provides no more or less evidence than this other guy. He could be telling the truth or could be a crazy liar, there’s simply no way to tell
I find flat earth theories interesting and some of their claims even compelling. But I'm also usually able to find credible evidence debunking it.
Do I believe that the government would lie about the moon landing and even lie about the shape of the planet? Yes
Am I convinced enough to abandon global Earth theory and take up flat earth theory? No. It's frustrating that the debate involves so much name calling and condescending pretentiousness. Both sides should develop scientific experiments people can do on their own that prove the Earth to be a globe or flat.
To me, science is something that can be verified in an experiment. You can verify someone's sexual gender via a test of chromosomes. You cannot test someone's whimsical make believe gender with a scientific method, therefore it's junk and a social construct.