42
posted ago by LeoLittlebook ago by LeoLittlebook +42 / -0

Attribution

The following is adapted from Tom's entertainingly-stylized doom poasting on 4Chan.

Transcription

I will say yet again that RNA transcription to DNA is not proven.

It is in vitro, and will soon be in vivo:

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line | Lund University, Sweden

Heritability

  • Females are born with all the eggs they will ever have.
  • The vax accumulates in the ovaries.
  • mRNA can reverse transcribe into DNA.

If you needed more proof that the mRNA-LNP therapy that targets the ovaries is transfecting the progeny, it is here:

Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibits adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion | Zhen Qin et al

The paper proves LNP+mRNA immune heritability specifically, which is the same tech used in C-19 vaccines.

The authors don't realise what they have done here, and just think this is an epigenetic alteration. Except only the maternally-immunized mice progeny were affected.

It's going through peer review now. If this is confirmed, it means that whatever genetic material was in that mRNA-LNP that was given to pre-conception women is now in the offspring of those women. The patent attorneys are going to be having a field day.

This study isn't a smoking gun, more of an inadvertent discovery pointing toward something truly terrible by accident. The authors checked what the underlying techs used in the vaccine did for another application.

Then smart readers noted the implications of delivery system + payload. "So that's what we're shooting into people with a bioweapon payload inserted."

(Technically, the grant applications didn't call it a "bioweapon", but a gain-of-function bio-defense chimerical virus intended to assist vaccine development against novel threats. Which it certainly did, considering how fast ModeRNA developed the vaccine. And it also boosted vax sales! Good to see a profitable government program for once.)

Patentability

From Who owns who? | Arkmedic:

If a therapeutic patented RNA is injected into a mother, and it is passed to the offspring of that mother, the owner of the patent can claim licensure rights on the offspring.

Moderna are going after the patent rights because they know that the children of mothers who have taken either Moderna or Pfizer mRNA vaccines can be subject to licensure.

In simple terms, Moderna may claim ownership of those children.

The birth of a new species… a patented species. First there was Homo Sapiens, and now there is Homo ModeRNA©.

Infertility

1st gen

We already know the vax damages human fertility in women. Men are also affected, although it seems temporary:

Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors

Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors.

This damage lasts up to 6 months per shot. Some places are boosting every 3 months. Do the math what happens when multiple periods of diminished virility overlap.

Each shot damages fertility by roughly 20%. Double vax = fertility damaged by 40% roughly. People haven't received enough to be fully sterilized, but that's not long from now by the look of things. 5th shots being pushed in places already.

2nd gen

acquired immune traits

And what if the acquired immune trait is immune deficiency or an autoimmune disorder caused by LNP+spike concentration in offspring ovaries?

If female children of vaccinated mothers inherit the fertility damage, then daughters may be completely infertile.

If you want to cause depopulation, spay the bitches, don't neuter the boys. Children of Men timeline is a go?

Whistleblower corroborated

Interestingly, this squares with a Dec 2020 4Chan whistleblower post, who claimed that the mRNA vaccines would target the ovaries to sterilize the daughters of the vaxxed.

Most people think the scientific paper approval process goes like this:

  1. Preprint
  2. Peer review
  3. Published paper

In actuality I'm discovering it's a lot more like this:

  1. 4Chan pol whistleblower
  2. Preprint
  3. Peer review
  4. Published paper

Further research

We won't know the truth until this generation's infants reach puberty. There might be earlier indicators like infant/childhood hormonal imbalances or the known modified sequences appearing on the kid's serum PCRs, but all those tell you is that transfection has taken place, not what sort of damage was done over the long term. So far all we have is evidence pointing to the definitives:

  • The spike ruins fertility in both sexes.
  • The mRNA+LNP tech permanently rewrites the human genome to produce the spike.
  • The vaccine causes fetuses/newborns to inherit the vaccine-induced modifications to immunity response, including anything carried by mRNA+LNP, so in this case the spike.

We have NO DATA on what spike does to infants or their development. They just started squirting this shit into toddlers.

From Arkmedic's feed chat:

It would be important to do PCR on the serum of any offspring looking for sequences of the product. If present you would have a billion dollar case

So those of you having kids with vaccinated mothers, perform polymerase-chain-reaction testing on their serum samples to see if any altered genes show up.