Thou shalt love thy neighbour. Tell me about those Canaanities. Aw they aren't very good neighbours. Gotcha. They worshipped a different god. So it's open season?
But tell me what Nehemiah says about foreigners? How they'll destroy the walls from within, or something.
The heart for the feather. It goes back to Egypt. If you were of a pure heart, good deeds, kind actions, kept to the code of laws. You went to heaven. It was invented by Egypt. If not you went into another kind of hell. I don't need to describe it. Eternally damned lost in the darkness. Something something. The heart had to weigh the same as a feather. It was judged when you died. There was a few other gatekeepers prior to judgement but even the Greeks had a similar version of this in their pantheon. They all did.
Umm what happened chuck. Evolution obviously.
So now are you getting it?
Simply reply to a previous comment again. It's no problem. But now you're changing subject. You're quoting another revision and it's the new testament and it's another relayering ontop of the source. It has changed over time, adapting. But those code of laws, go back to the above.
There are technically 13.
But okay what are Hammurabi's laws?
Thou shalt love thy neighbour. Tell me about those Canaanities. Aw they aren't very good neighbours. Gotcha. They worshipped a different god. So it's open season?
But tell me what Nehemiah says about foreigners? How they'll destroy the walls from within, or something.
The heart for the feather. It goes back to Egypt. If you were of a pure heart, good deeds, kind actions, kept to the code of laws. You went to heaven. It was invented by Egypt. If not you went into another kind of hell. I don't need to describe it. Eternally damned lost in the darkness. Something something. The heart had to weigh the same as a feather. It was judged when you died. There was a few other gatekeepers prior to judgement but even the Greeks had a similar version of this in their pantheon. They all did.
Umm what happened chuck. Evolution obviously.
So now are you getting it?
Simply reply to a previous comment again. It's no problem. But now you're changing subject. You're quoting another revision and it's the new testament and it's another relayering ontop of the source. It has changed over time, adapting. But those code of laws, go back to the above.