When I was a child in England, I spend all of my time outdoors exploring. I've found all kinds of strange things since then. One day, back when I was a child, we were on land which was unused and difficult to cross. However, it wasn't far from houses. We came across a pool of thick black liquid, looked like oil. It was very strange. Looked like it was coming out of the ground.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Everything moving within the perceivable source of light implies inspiration; hence a constant flow for each within to enlighten oneself by. "not" on the other hand cannot be perceived; hence it being suggested to you by others.
Instead of insulting others...question the source of "nothing".
a) look at my comment history...I don't offer (no threads started). I only adapt to what inspires me; while most fall for the temptation to get offended by suggestions.
b) need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (agreement vs disagreement). Try it..it sustains free will of choice.
c) WIS (knowledge aka perceivable) DOM (dominance aka balance)...one represents the perceiving within perceivable and the choice within balance. Why do you think that wisdom represents what others "pretend to spew"? Share your perspective about terms like "wisdom".
The perceivable reality was before you could make a suggestion about it. One cannot define what something is without ignoring that it was beforehand.
How does suggesting definitions about others helps oneself to grow? Why not express yourself instead of labeling others?
IN SANUS (within sound) and what you call spamming represents FRE'QUENCY, noun - "occurrence of a thing often repeated at short intervals".
Gambling suggested values equals loss of evaluation within perceivable value.
I got kittens in the barn; all kinds of skins drying in the greenhouse (indirect sunlight) and watched Psycho once (wasn't impressed by it). On the other hand....I liked the remake with Vince Vaughn and (conspiracy drum-roll...) "Anne Heche".
a) perceivable inspiration represents the ongoing notice for adaptation.
b) ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) reduces awareness and comprehension of perceivable reality through suggested fiction.
Only within an ongoing system (process of dying) can there be a start (inception) and finish (death) for those temporarily living within.
Every one is sensing perceivable input (inspiration); no one can make sense, yet the few are suggesting the rhetoric "making sense" to the consenting many as to tempt them to ignore their perceiving senses.
In other words...One cannot act; only react (living) to an enacting system (dying) aka one cannot make; only remake what's already perceivable.
I seldom even read usernames; nor do I consent to own a username. Try insulting "free-will-of-choice" without shooting yourself in the foot...
Anyway...nature doesn't brand anything; it communicates itself as perceivable inspiration (moving differences) by simply moving everything forwards. Enacting velocity causes momentum (balance) which causes reacting resistance (choice) at its center. That balance represents the perceivable, ever changing moment and the center thereof represents each ones free will of choice.
I adapt to whatever inspires me; not to how others want me to behave, hence using free will of choice. Trying to restrict this represents the same modus operandi used to suggest the many that oil (or anything in existence) can run out.
All limitations are based on the temporary reactor (living) choosing to ignore the ongoing generator (dying) for how others suggest them to react (hope; fear; repression; aggression etc.).
a) to be implies out of; within and therefore in response to. Want (suggested) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) the foundation for "how" implies motion and those within motion are tempted to want to go with it; while ignoring the need to resist it. Resisting temptation represents living within the process of dying.
c) to choose want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to see perceivable (reality) through the lens of suggested (fiction).
d) the "I" represents the lack of comprehension towards all representing one in energy. There's no "I" in energy. Self differentiation from whole (loss) into partial (growth) tempts the partial to ignore the whole; hence allowing temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying).
e) ask yourself if before want vs not want conflict; there exist a need/want balance with your choice at the center? Do you need to see what others want to be?