When I was a child in England, I spend all of my time outdoors exploring. I've found all kinds of strange things since then. One day, back when I was a child, we were on land which was unused and difficult to cross. However, it wasn't far from houses. We came across a pool of thick black liquid, looked like oil. It was very strange. Looked like it was coming out of the ground.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/ to lay out the revisionism + my comprehension of perceivable inspiration.
As for INTERPRETA'TION, noun [Latin interpretatio.] - "explanation of unintelligible words in language that is intelligible"...before the suggested word exists the perceivable sound; so any attempt to translate suggested words; further tempts to ignore perceivable sound.
Try implication (if/then) over reason (agreement vs disagreement) while adapting to whatever inspires.
That's rather specific for calling others "faggot"...
Back to topic...should perceivable reality be interpreted with a suggested dictionary or does that open up revisionism like the above mentioned "crude" example?
Does no (nothing) represents perceivable inspiration or suggested information?
What does suggesting "no" within a moving system imply?
Does it matter if one suggests yes (want) or no (not want) to the need of breathing?
What's the implication of the living agreeing or disagreeing with the process of dying?