When I was a child in England, I spend all of my time outdoors exploring. I've found all kinds of strange things since then. One day, back when I was a child, we were on land which was unused and difficult to cross. However, it wasn't far from houses. We came across a pool of thick black liquid, looked like oil. It was very strange. Looked like it was coming out of the ground.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
I'm Jed. I was out shooting at some food and up.from.the ground...you know....AMA.
Oil is the second most abundant liquid on earth. The term fossil fuel is just wordplay. The idea that dead dinosaurs is just plain silly. The term that should be used is abiogenic hydrocarbons.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
a) the finite (living) exists within the infinite (process of dying). Ignoring this allows others to suggest abundance and insufficiency; hence tempting them to want or not want limited amounts suggested by others.
b) ask yourself if the few suggest CRUDE, adjective - "not changed from its natural state" to tempt the many to ignore that their state (living) implies within constant change (dying)?
c) NATURE, noun [born, produced]...doesn't that sound like an ongoing generator (dying) for liquid reactors (living) within?
d) are the ingredients oil and salt required to conceive offspring?
Difficult to cross implies obstacles (any thing that stands in the way and hinders progress)...everything perceivable has to be within progress for those within to be able to perceive it. Doesn't progression contradicts "unused"?
free_will is a schizophrenic who uses bot technology to help him spew word salad all over. For unknown reasons, blocking does not eliminate his spam.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/ to lay out the revisionism + my comprehension of perceivable inspiration.
As for INTERPRETA'TION, noun [Latin interpretatio.] - "explanation of unintelligible words in language that is intelligible"...before the suggested word exists the perceivable sound; so any attempt to translate suggested words; further tempts to ignore perceivable sound.
Try implication (if/then) over reason (agreement vs disagreement) while adapting to whatever inspires.
That's rather specific for calling others "faggot"...
Back to topic...should perceivable reality be interpreted with a suggested dictionary or does that open up revisionism like the above mentioned "crude" example?
Does no (nothing) represents perceivable inspiration or suggested information?
What does suggesting "no" within a moving system imply?
Does it matter if one suggests yes (want) or no (not want) to the need of breathing?
What's the implication of the living agreeing or disagreeing with the process of dying?