Dude, there’s no difference in that compound besides one proton. In water that’s exactly what graphene oxide would turn into. I’m saying all the graphene oxide claims that people are making have zero published data referencing which lots they tested, much less any sort of lab data supporting it’s presence.
I like and respect the work you do, axo but attacking me for pointing out this is lacking in any sort of substantial evidence ain’t a good look for you.
Dr. Noack was a world expert on graphene hydroxide. He was very clear what he was observing was NOT graphene oxide. It's a very important distinction. Sorry I came off strong, but you clearly didn't research this individual and his theory before commenting.
Yes I did, dude. There is no real distinction in cytosol or in solution. Graphene is a family of compounds with an almost infinite number of conformations and functional group arrangements.
You’re grasping here. He has published ZERO reproducible, traceable, or verifiable proof of graphene oxide (or hydroxide since you’re unclear on IUPAC nomenclature here) derivatives in a specific lot of a specific manufacture. There’s zero evidence of this. The only reason people are claiming he’s a world expert on this subject is because thats what the source is saying. No one fucking knew who this guy was before this claim.
Unsubstantiated. No data posted to show graphene oxide in specific batches. Or even which manufacturers. I remember this shit from 18 months ago.
hey look a "deboonker" who didn't even read the headline correctly.
graphene hydroxide retard
Show me the nomenclature difference between graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide, please. Show me which phenol group is hydrolyzed at which carbon.
Can you do that, or are you too ignorant to admit you don’t know what you’re talking about?
Dude, there’s no difference in that compound besides one proton. In water that’s exactly what graphene oxide would turn into. I’m saying all the graphene oxide claims that people are making have zero published data referencing which lots they tested, much less any sort of lab data supporting it’s presence.
Edit: more info on GO characterization.
I like and respect the work you do, axo but attacking me for pointing out this is lacking in any sort of substantial evidence ain’t a good look for you.
Dr. Noack was a world expert on graphene hydroxide. He was very clear what he was observing was NOT graphene oxide. It's a very important distinction. Sorry I came off strong, but you clearly didn't research this individual and his theory before commenting.
Yes I did, dude. There is no real distinction in cytosol or in solution. Graphene is a family of compounds with an almost infinite number of conformations and functional group arrangements.
You’re grasping here. He has published ZERO reproducible, traceable, or verifiable proof of graphene oxide (or hydroxide since you’re unclear on IUPAC nomenclature here) derivatives in a specific lot of a specific manufacture. There’s zero evidence of this. The only reason people are claiming he’s a world expert on this subject is because thats what the source is saying. No one fucking knew who this guy was before this claim.
So show me some evidence please.