Im talking the version released in 2013 (season 1) and 2014 (season 2) not the watered down Amazon version released in late 2020. ALthough season 1 and 2 are available on Amazon Prime.
TL;DW
Tells of a fake pandemic to cause Humanity to willingly take a vaccine that causes hereditary sterilization. This is a two stage poison, the first stage being contaminating our food. When this protein from our food is ingested, and married with the protein from the mass vaccination, sterilization occurs. The main foes are a network of unrelated agencies that are able to stage false flags (such as school shootings, pandemics) that are above the law, and are able to create false identities/lives (such as false medical histories of depression in the event of a "suicide", false criminal indictments, deep faking surveillance, sleeper cells of false wives/concubiones meant to keep those "in the know" hostage", basically any illuminati conspiracy etc.) Finishing seaon one and watching the first 15 mintues of season 2 caused me to write this.
WTF
As long as one watches what another ones suggests; so long is one distracted from everything perceivable.
a) will represents choice; cause of reacting choice represents enacting balance perceived...not imbalances suggested.
b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] represents the effect caused by AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] aka form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death).
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each perceiving one exists within everything perceivable; hence everyone is "in the know"; they just lack comprehension thereof; because they consent to stand under (understanding) suggested information instead of growing comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
Just curious, do have anything to say on what you are perceiving is going on?
On will and choice . .. not sure what you are getting at, can you elaborate?
On knowledge - understanding,
Inspiration from what? Say a tv series?
"just" implies that which "just is" aka the natural order aka life being moved from inception towards death; while "curiosity" implies the want of the living for a suggested outcome; which tempts one to ignore that the outcome for life is predefined at inception as death.
a) "do have anything" implies ignoring everything perceivable for anything others suggest they have.
b) what's going on implies the ongoing process of dying; within which the temporary living momentarily sustain themselves by resisting the natural order (need) or ignoring to do so for following suggested orders (want).
c) the many ignore being within a moving system; which the parasitic few are exploiting by suggesting them affixed information; which tempts the many to ignore perceivable inspiration. For example the suggested word tempts one to ignore the perceivable sound; out of which perceiving choice can shape suggestible words.
a) a blueprint implies a plan for an outcome; yet life isn't outcome oriented (towards death); but a response to origin (being moved towards death) for the sustenance of living while dying. The few suggest "blueprint" as an outcome to tempt the many to seek alternatives outcomes; hence consenting to suggested progressivism aka going with the flow instead of resisting it.
b) the suggestion of "new world order" tempts the many to want to hold onto "old world order"; while ignoring that the natural order represents being moved from inception towards death; which implies the need for those within to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Look around you...the many fall for suggested temptations (want vs not want imbalance) instead of being the response-ability (choice) within perceivable balance (need/want) aka perceivable inspiration (need) or suggested information (want).
a) choice can only exist at the center of balance; while balance can only exist at the center (momentum) of motion. What your senses perceive represents the ever changing moment (um) of life being moved from inception towards death.
b) breathing represents a perceivable need aka motion impressing upon you until you're forced to resist by adaptation. If I suggest you to choose to want or not want to breathe and you reason (want vs not want) about it while holding your breath; you will quickly be forced by the "need" to adapt.
What I suggested represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action); what you perceived represents IN (within) SPIR (spirit; spiro -"to breathe" aka forms adaptation to flow) -ATION (through action). In other words...choice represents the reaction within an enacting system (balance aka the momentum of motion).
Need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want) helps one to resist temptation; yet it needs to be utilized by free will of choice; hence willingly.
c) to be implies out of; within and in response to; hence being perceiving within perceivable; reaction within enacting; form within flow; potential within potentiality; choice within balance etc.
d) what if one represents "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom?
e) what if living within the process of dying implies being resistance within temptation; and what if temporary resisting ongoing temptation requires a constant flow of perceivable inspiration for adaptation?
Understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka a willing submission of choice to choice.
Knowledge represents perceivable inspiration; which implies being the one perceiving it from within; hence having the choice to react to enacting inspiration aka the choice to adapt to input. The more one adapts to perceivable inspiration; the more one grows comprehension of perceivable.
What if living within the process of dying represents being temporary growth within ongoing loss? What if both in coexistence with each other (loss/growth) represent EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"? What if all represents one in energy? What if energy internally self differentiates from flow (loss) through momentum (balance) into form (growth)...a self sustaining system.
Consider the following...impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss)...depending on choice?
From the alchemy perspective...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents the transmutation of ingredient (form) out of base (flow). The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything).
a) Inspiration from perceiving moving differences; which inspire the sustenance of oneself; which is being tempted by suggested information by others aka idolatry; branding of moving differences with affixed meaning aka naming a moving system.
"change" doesn't require a brand to be perceivable; nor for the perceiving to adapt to it; yet consent by the many to the suggested label "change" by the few allows the few to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning thereof; hence the many being lured into the mental hamster-wheel of reasoning (want vs not want) among each other about climate "change" for example.
b) the many consent to watch; which allows the few to tell-a-vision; to shape the suggested information within the consenting memory of the many.
The few suggest "actors" to tempt the many to ignore that being directed implies being a reactor to direction aka a reactor (living) within a directing generator (process of dying).
The suggest pictures (captured moment) to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable ongoing moment (um), which then allows the few to suggest movies (motion pictures) aka captured moments mimicking movement; which then allows the few to suggest SE'RIES, noun - "continued succession in the things of the same order and bearing the same relation to each other". Meanwhile...being perceiving within perceivable implies being a differentiated partial (perceiving) out of a self differentiating whole (perceivable).
If one watches a tv show while looking for information suggested; one fell for the temptation of ignoring all perceivable inspiration. If one already comprehends the differences between perceivable and suggested; then the temptation of all suggested diminishes as ones resistance within it grows. Then one can reverse engineer how the choice of others shaped the suggested information and how it tempts the ignorance of perceivable inspiration among others.
tl;dr...struggle to resist the temptation to consent to what everyone else is suggesting you the perceivable reality means. Others cannot define the whole reality they each represent a partial within, yet they can suggest each other to believe their suggested definitions; which when consented to gives them power over others. The suggested word over the perceivable sound represents spell-craft aka the few crafting the spelling of the consenting many through suggestion.