Well, I'm in favor of all gays doing ass to mouth until e coli takes them down.
Nature and evolution created sex in order to reproduce creatures. Natural sex produces offspring. Non-natural sex is abnormal and it can't be argued as being normal. Biologists have noted that we are in a sense merely multicelled creatures whose sole purpose from the standpoint of nature is to let our DNA replicate itself. Homosexual activity does not replicate DNA. It is an aberration. Anal sex is unclean, as well as risking tears of the intestine. It is thus somewhat anti-survival. As is pedophilia but that is another topic.
if i were a eugencist psychopath and wanted to spread a bioweapon, using the gays to incubate, clone, and amplify the expression would be the perfect agent to introduce into a large biological system. they are basically a pcr factory to make copies of transmissible diseases. eventually exposure becomes rampant and infects the population when they have sex with kids and women.
How is something that doesn’t kill that many people an existential threat? I agree that it’s bad, amoral, and should be discouraged supremely but like the flu kills more people, is the flu an existential threat? Are auto accidents an existential threat?
Well, I'm in favor of all gays doing ass to mouth until e coli takes them down.
Nature and evolution created sex in order to reproduce creatures. Natural sex produces offspring. Non-natural sex is abnormal and it can't be argued as being normal. Biologists have noted that we are in a sense merely multicelled creatures whose sole purpose from the standpoint of nature is to let our DNA replicate itself. Homosexual activity does not replicate DNA. It is an aberration. Anal sex is unclean, as well as risking tears of the intestine. It is thus somewhat anti-survival. As is pedophilia but that is another topic.
Spreading their diseases just makes more sodomites. They also fuck women.
if i were a eugencist psychopath and wanted to spread a bioweapon, using the gays to incubate, clone, and amplify the expression would be the perfect agent to introduce into a large biological system. they are basically a pcr factory to make copies of transmissible diseases. eventually exposure becomes rampant and infects the population when they have sex with kids and women.
How is something that doesn’t kill that many people an existential threat? I agree that it’s bad, amoral, and should be discouraged supremely but like the flu kills more people, is the flu an existential threat? Are auto accidents an existential threat?