Are ‘conspiracy theorists’ more likely to believe an authoritative message when it comes from someone else? Or... Are they more likely to focus on the validity of the message itself without placing all their trust on the messenger?
The Google-sponsored RAND report recommends that the government bet on the former.
They can't step outside their own worldview.
If we booed Trump when he touted the vax, what makes them think we'll listen to anyone?
But I guess they HAVE to choose option 1. They don't have the facts to make option 2 work.
This sounds like a predetermined report. Rand corporation always does studies which support new programs... To say the message matters would be to essentially say 'cant do anything '...
This is the 'reason' they use to start a program they already wanted to start.
The more you read, the more you can tell that they're just making it all up. Also, I think it's entirely pointless even trying to talk to anyone that believes any of it. But then again, everyone is also free to slam their head against a wall.
"wHy dONt' thEY TRyst usSs?"
They can't step outside their own worldview.
If we booed Trump when he touted the vax, what makes them think we'll listen to anyone?
But I guess they HAVE to choose option 1. They don't have the facts to make option 2 work.
This sounds like a predetermined report. Rand corporation always does studies which support new programs... To say the message matters would be to essentially say 'cant do anything '...
This is the 'reason' they use to start a program they already wanted to start.
The more you read, the more you can tell that they're just making it all up. Also, I think it's entirely pointless even trying to talk to anyone that believes any of it. But then again, everyone is also free to slam their head against a wall.