Are population statistics being manipulated? More in comments.
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
I was thinking this very same thing recently, and had the idea that perhaps both China and India are faking their population sizes by up to 50%
They claim a lot of the population live outside the urban areas.....but what country do you know where that the population greatly outnumbers the urban?
Most are concentrated in the urban areas, and yet these two countries miraculously fall out of that pattern.
Reading Creature From Jekyll Island. Pg 521 discussion on The Report From Iron Mountain. This passage strikes me. What if the boogeyman is a farce? Historically, China just wants to be left alone.
https://thediplomat.com/2022/03/how-reliable-are-chinas-statistics/#!%23:~:text=According%20to%20the%20seventh%20national,awaited%20press%20conference%20in%20Beijing.%20%E2%80%A6
That book is a tough read, but well worth the time.
I had an east indian friend who told me no one in India claims there is a billion people. He said they claim around 300 million.
The population is greatly overcounted. How do sub Saharan countries get enough money set aside to do a census on their populations? Same goes for India and China. The logistics are insane. It takes America over a year to fully count the population. And we use proven methods to speed it up.
But its not about population. It's about farming space. And we can easily produce enough cultivated acreage to feed Humanity forever no matter the population. Not to mention aquaculture and modern methods.
a) suggested statistics measure a body at rest; living implies being moved from inception towards death.
b) there's no cessation of motion to be measured for the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole. Therefore all measurements are based on the suggested 0...a mimicry of a center within a resting balance; which ignores that free will of choice represents the center of the moving balance (momentum aka the perceivable ever changing moment).
c) consenting to suggested 0 tempts ONE to ignore self. The sleight of hand for this represents NUMBER; noun - "the designation of a unit"; from Latin unitas - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable).
d) POP'ULATE, verb [Latin populus.] - "to breed". Are the many breeding or are they being bred by the few?
e) to imbalance ones choice; the few suggest exponential growing numbers on one side (debt; population; fear etc.) and total loss on the other side (extinction; scarcity; no way out; no opportunities etc.) All this and then some to tempt the many to ignore being the center (choice) of a balance based system, as the ones perceiving all perceivable offered aka being temporary (finite) within ongoing (infinite).
One doesn't add anything to all; nor can one take anything from all. It's the whole which self segregates into partial for self sustenance by internal loss (dying) and growth (living) in balance with each other aka EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Comprehension about this needs to be grown by each living one; while resisting the temptation of loss (dying). All suggested (information) represents the temptation to ignore all perceivable (inspiration) for it.
f) to breathe; to quench thirst; to still hunger; to shelter...neither require one to count. Others use suggestion to tempt one to count... https://pic8.co/sh/d3zQhx.jpg
You're so awesome!