We will know our DISINFORMATION PROGRAM is complete when EVERYTHING the American public believes to be true IS FALSE.
By his own admission, EVERYTHING IS FALSE.
Whatever you have been led to believe is a falsehood.
EVERYTHING.
Flip the script. This is where critical thinking skills get applied.
EVERYTHING they project upon us, through repetitive indoctrination, is FALSE.
Their disinformation program is selling falshood. Not reality.
take "false" out
everything is perceivable
before anyone can suggest what everything "is"; everything that is has to be perceivable to make suggestions about it. One cannot suggest "this is" without the "this" being perceivable beforehand.
how do your senses perceive false information? Could it be that you hold "true" information in your memory as to be able to compare it with the false information suggested?
Does perceivable reality has to be sold through suggestion or is it supplied towards "free" will of choice? Does choice represent the evaluation within all perceivable value?
Question the perceivable SCRIPT, noun (Latin scripo; to write) - "by way of distinction" + DISTINCT, adjective - "difference marked; separated by a visible sign"...does being moved from inception towards death represent the way of distinction for the different lives within?
The perceivable script cannot be flipped; since it distinct resistance (living) by way of forward motion (dying). The suggested script aka the mainstream narrative represents the inversion of resistance; hence submission to go with the flow; to follow suggested orders; to swim along the mainstream; to trail behind the pied piper; to follow those who lead; to progress towards etc.
The issue with flipping the suggested script is that flipping from not wanting suggested (false) to wanting suggested (true) represent both sides of the same coin of suggestion. It doesn't matter to the abortion racket if you chose to want (pro-choice) or not want (pro-life) it; only that you consent to the suggested abortion.
The "whatever" the living can be "led to" implies dying, which isn't a conflict of true vs false or believing vs non-believing; but a balance between need (adaptation to perceivable) or want (temptation of suggested).