If you've ever fired a gun more powerful than a .22, you know immediately this is a BS video.
Added: engineering analysis shows that every shot would lift the front end of the dog a little; this then requires time for the platform to restabilize and the camera vision to readjust and be able to acquire targets.Thus limiting the fire rate to single shots. Auto repeated fire would merely be a spray on a jittering platform.
The uniform concrete blocks show it's CGI.
The argument you're up against is "blah blah technical limitations." You see that stuff when shills argue against solar energy, electric cars or fast Internet. Hell, I've even seen it when they oppose fast trains.
If you've ever fired a gun more powerful than a .22, you know immediately this is a BS video. Added: engineering analysis shows that every shot would lift the front end of the dog a little; this then requires time for the platform to restabilize and the camera vision to readjust and be able to acquire targets.Thus limiting the fire rate to single shots. Auto repeated fire would merely be a spray on a jittering platform. The uniform concrete blocks show it's CGI.
You think AR-15 uses "high powered ammunition"?
You have no idea what you're talking about, bud.
Lol, a toy gun and its stopping power. How cute, Barbara. AR 15s are for edge lord wannabes with 007 posters hung over their beds. https://www.wildernessarena.com/supplies/weapons/gunshots-wounds-stopping-power-myth-vs-fact
Keep posting more bullshit like you always have. And it's still a bullshit CGI video.
First it's CGI because you think 5.45 is some gigantic elephant killing bullet, now it's fake because it's a toy gun? Make up your mind
The argument you're up against is "blah blah technical limitations." You see that stuff when shills argue against solar energy, electric cars or fast Internet. Hell, I've even seen it when they oppose fast trains.