This op-ed failed. The article begins with a peeve of mine. Trust the plan. But then falls right off the ledge. Q never said Assange was walking free. While I am no Q sycophant I appreciate the socratic method applied. I certainly haven’t thrown any loyalty toward anonymity of this caliber when answers have not been clearly defined and politics also being the hog pen of social elitism. I know the Epstein case is a huge plart of this and this attempt to smear any line of questioning using blatant falsehoods so simply refuttable makes one wonder why bother, Q was so 2020. How many baby fuckers are out there???

I can see where the authors head was at the time, but in retrospect, I think he was wrong.

Suddenly, whenever I’d write about President Trump’s nonstop warmongering and capitulations to longstanding neoconservative agendas

Where did all of that end up though? Because it seems it led to peace deals and American energy independence.

This article may have seemed correct in 2018. But it has not aged well.

This article from 2003, updated in 2018 by G Edward Griffin goes over the predictability and repetitiveness of it all

yeah, the deep state exposed themselves for the rats they are as part of their plan- nonsense lol

It was clear to anyone who was in the Conspiracy space prior to 2016.....only people who were 'awakened' didn't know that.

--- when people started to talking about Qanon it was 2017 and it was suddenly everywhere like Ukraine....in others words...NPCssss