Ah Lenny. He was on the edge, for his time, and he addressed societal censorship. He talked about how words themselves are just words - linguistic symbols of concepts - and yet mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable. In other words, a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air - but it is what parts of society assign to the use of the word that is the problem.
a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air
In-between perceivable sound (need) and suggestible words (want) operates choice. The response of choice to perceivable sound (resonance) represents natural law; the submission of choice to suggested choices (dissonance) represents contract law.
As for "just" in the air...consider breathing (aka Latin spiro; spirit)?
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...how could one perceive sound without being within and by the source of all perceivable sound?
mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable
What if consenting to use suggested words represents PUNISH (afflict pain) MENT (mind) upon self within a system of perceivable sound? Doesn't what we call communication aka agreement versus disagreement over suggested information represent a self inflicted punishment; division; conflict of reason?
Why would the parasitic few suggest up vs downvote tools on their social media platforms other than fermenting division among the many? When was the last time you agreed or disagreed with breathing? Were thirst; hunger and need for shelter ever an issue of agreement (want) versus disagreement (not want) or always a responsibility (need)?
Ah Lenny. He was on the edge, for his time, and he addressed societal censorship. He talked about how words themselves are just words - linguistic symbols of concepts - and yet mere use of the 'wrong' word was punishable. In other words, a word itself is not criminal - it's just sounds in the air - but it is what parts of society assign to the use of the word that is the problem.
In-between perceivable sound (need) and suggestible words (want) operates choice. The response of choice to perceivable sound (resonance) represents natural law; the submission of choice to suggested choices (dissonance) represents contract law.
As for "just" in the air...consider breathing (aka Latin spiro; spirit)?
I'm very tired of this bot. It parrots data it's learned and forms contextually meaningless posts. DAILY spam.
In sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...how could one perceive sound without being within and by the source of all perceivable sound?
What if consenting to use suggested words represents PUNISH (afflict pain) MENT (mind) upon self within a system of perceivable sound? Doesn't what we call communication aka agreement versus disagreement over suggested information represent a self inflicted punishment; division; conflict of reason?
Why would the parasitic few suggest up vs downvote tools on their social media platforms other than fermenting division among the many? When was the last time you agreed or disagreed with breathing? Were thirst; hunger and need for shelter ever an issue of agreement (want) versus disagreement (not want) or always a responsibility (need)?
You're schizophrenic, not a guru. Also, I see you're using software tools in this spamming.