Where in isiah does it say Jesus would command someone to cut an assistants ear off? That's ridiculous you're ridiculous. secondly there were two swords and there's some discrepancy around versions what was said. Either "that's enough" like 2 swords being sufficient or "that's enough!" (of this bullshit because you pussies are worried about pretty clothes rather than defending yourself)
Jesus literally ordered his apostles to smack a guy upside his head with a fucking sword, that's not very pacifist, rabbi.
If you're going to take the passage so literally (why is a sword the word) then why aren't you atheist screaming that swords obviously can't be words? Go ahead. Where the fuck do you think you're going with this arguement?
Luke 22:36 Jesus says "Let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one."
In that case, a VBIED would be more appropriate. There are several hundred people there who need to be taken out.
Why does anyone need a weapon of war? Why didn't the preacher practice what he preached?
Where in isiah does it say Jesus would command someone to cut an assistants ear off? That's ridiculous you're ridiculous. secondly there were two swords and there's some discrepancy around versions what was said. Either "that's enough" like 2 swords being sufficient or "that's enough!" (of this bullshit because you pussies are worried about pretty clothes rather than defending yourself)
Jesus literally ordered his apostles to smack a guy upside his head with a fucking sword, that's not very pacifist, rabbi.
If you're going to take the passage so literally (why is a sword the word) then why aren't you atheist screaming that swords obviously can't be words? Go ahead. Where the fuck do you think you're going with this arguement?