take all the fuckery happening in the current moment and then multiply it by all the instances of historical facts of the past. that's how hard it is to actually make sense of anything. there's nothing special about the current moment. recent not recent, that's not the point. the point is the past is even harder to discern than the present, not the other way around, like we were taught in school
RE'CENT, adjective [Latin recens.] - "new; being of late origin or existence".
a) "there's nothing new under the sun". Test this by trying to form a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration. The ones perceiving cannot add anything new into all perceivable. Why? Because ALL perceivable self differentiates into each ONE perceiving it from within.
b) ask yourself if there can exist anything perceivable beyond the ever changing moment? Afterwards question being form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death).
c) what if the parasitic few use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore moment(um) by distracting them with suggested past; present and future; which when consented to allows them to narrate his-story; hopes; fears and so on?
d) what if you represent the accumulation of all that was; the response to all that is and the choice to shape all that will be? Wouldn't it be very beneficial for others to tempt you to ignore such comprehension; such potential; such finite access to an infinite source?
Carnavores don't make good fertilizer.
take all the fuckery happening in the current moment and then multiply it by all the instances of historical facts of the past. that's how hard it is to actually make sense of anything. there's nothing special about the current moment. recent not recent, that's not the point. the point is the past is even harder to discern than the present, not the other way around, like we were taught in school
a) "there's nothing new under the sun". Test this by trying to form a "new" thought without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration. The ones perceiving cannot add anything new into all perceivable. Why? Because ALL perceivable self differentiates into each ONE perceiving it from within.
b) ask yourself if there can exist anything perceivable beyond the ever changing moment? Afterwards question being form (life) within the momentum of flow (inception towards death).
c) what if the parasitic few use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore moment(um) by distracting them with suggested past; present and future; which when consented to allows them to narrate his-story; hopes; fears and so on?
d) what if you represent the accumulation of all that was; the response to all that is and the choice to shape all that will be? Wouldn't it be very beneficial for others to tempt you to ignore such comprehension; such potential; such finite access to an infinite source?