This was about getting a statement from someone without reading the miranda rights - which has been common practice for the last 100 years. The guy wasn't detained in any way. Not sure why everyone thinks this is a huge departure from how police operate.
Now I'm saying that to say this - NEVER talk to the police without an attorney present.
agreed. the way the title is written, i thought the ruling would allow an 'arrest' without knowledge of the arrested and indefinite surveillance without a court order. sounds nightmarish, but actually not too different than what the N_A is already doing.
but i do like the idea of all gov LEO's being required to remind you of your miranda rights before speaking to you for any purpose
This was about getting a statement from someone without reading the miranda rights - which has been common practice for the last 100 years. The guy wasn't detained in any way. Not sure why everyone thinks this is a huge departure from how police operate.
Now I'm saying that to say this - NEVER talk to the police without an attorney present.
agreed. the way the title is written, i thought the ruling would allow an 'arrest' without knowledge of the arrested and indefinite surveillance without a court order. sounds nightmarish, but actually not too different than what the N_A is already doing.
but i do like the idea of all gov LEO's being required to remind you of your miranda rights before speaking to you for any purpose