Faith implies consenting to the suggested information by others; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Hope implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring to adapt to being processed by origin.
Increasing represents growing resistance to being moved towards outcome; while resisting the suggested temptations to ignore this from others.
normies are "blissfully ignorant"
Aka willingly consenting to suggested information by others; hence having faith or lack of in, and hope or fear towards. All while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
some may fear what they are told to fear...
...while the others hope what they are to hope for. Hope (want) vs Fear (not want) both ignore need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
forces at play
Force of velocity (inception towards death) causing force of resistance (life)...the latter not representing a game to win; but a response-ability to sustain self through struggle.
How much better, then, would it be
To be implies choice within balance (need/want); which you are tempted to ignore for a want (better) vs not want (worse) conflict aka imbalance in ignorance of balance.
you can't change anything outside of your immediate sphere.
IM (wtihin) MEDIATE (Latin medius; middle) aka free will of choice at the center of balance (the momentum of ongoing motion). Living represents the response to being changed by dying; hence the temporary opportunity to shape life (growth) within the process of dying (loss).
Growing (living) represents an expression of impressing loss (dying).
If other people can get in your head
They do so by choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; which was industrialized for mass population control as RELIGON (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
The original bond represents perceivable balance (enacting) towards perceiving choice (reacting) all within the natural order.
If it helps to have faith in an external "higher power" then find that.
What if that external "higher power" can only be expressed through self by resisting it? What if the living can only grow by resisting the loss of dying? What if others suggest faith; belief; submission; consent to the higher power as an authority above oneself; as to tempt one to ignore being the temporary resistance within the ongoing natural order?
In other words...what if you represent the internal center of the external power; while being processed for both of your responding choice of need (growth) and want (loss) which together represents the internal balance (loss/growth) aka the self sustaining core of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"?
There are plenty of doom posts here.
They represent the suggested temptation for one to choose to ignore that which is perceivable (reality) for that which others suggest will be (fiction). The few utilize suggested information to tempt the many to ignore perceivable inspiration.
Faith implies consenting to the suggested information by others; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Hope implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring to adapt to being processed by origin.
Increasing represents growing resistance to being moved towards outcome; while resisting the suggested temptations to ignore this from others.
Aka willingly consenting to suggested information by others; hence having faith or lack of in, and hope or fear towards. All while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
...while the others hope what they are to hope for. Hope (want) vs Fear (not want) both ignore need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
Force of velocity (inception towards death) causing force of resistance (life)...the latter not representing a game to win; but a response-ability to sustain self through struggle.
To be implies choice within balance (need/want); which you are tempted to ignore for a want (better) vs not want (worse) conflict aka imbalance in ignorance of balance.
IM (wtihin) MEDIATE (Latin medius; middle) aka free will of choice at the center of balance (the momentum of ongoing motion). Living represents the response to being changed by dying; hence the temporary opportunity to shape life (growth) within the process of dying (loss).
Growing (living) represents an expression of impressing loss (dying).
They do so by choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; which was industrialized for mass population control as RELIGON (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
The original bond represents perceivable balance (enacting) towards perceiving choice (reacting) all within the natural order.
What if that external "higher power" can only be expressed through self by resisting it? What if the living can only grow by resisting the loss of dying? What if others suggest faith; belief; submission; consent to the higher power as an authority above oneself; as to tempt one to ignore being the temporary resistance within the ongoing natural order?
In other words...what if you represent the internal center of the external power; while being processed for both of your responding choice of need (growth) and want (loss) which together represents the internal balance (loss/growth) aka the self sustaining core of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power"?
They represent the suggested temptation for one to choose to ignore that which is perceivable (reality) for that which others suggest will be (fiction). The few utilize suggested information to tempt the many to ignore perceivable inspiration.