For example the word know as I used "kin" the Gaelic rooted word which has Old English but zero Latin or Greek root despite being lexically similar to "know". I think that "think" is the correct Saxon word for the same meaning but it is imprecise. From Latin it would be "comperhend"? Maybe, maybe "understand" but despite the Latin sounding "un-" I think that word may be a Saxon one. I am not sure. In Japanese it would be "wakaru".
a) KIN (alike) represents the reaction of differences (living) within sameness (dying).
b) KNOW (knowledge; perceivable) implies the differentiation of ALL perceivable into each ONE perceiving it from within.
c) THNIK (subjected to objectifying) implies thinking in response to perceivable or suggested. A reaction to enacting or ignoring it for the reactions of others.
d) COMPREHEND (compressed out of impressing) aka comprehension shaped out of perceivable input (inspiration) aka IN (within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka form to flow adaptation) -ATION (through action).
e) UNDERSTAND (standing under) aka standing under suggested input (information) aka IN (within) FORM (formed by flow) -ATION (thorough action).
Compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perception) implies through adaptation (spirit). One can learn this by breathing aka impression to compression for expression or repression. The more one trains compression; the more one can express of the impressing.
This ties back to the use of suggested words to tempt one to ignore the perceivable impression, like "YHWH". Instead of speaking it as a suggested word; try breathing it as perceivable sound? Notice Yah (breathing in the impressing); Hah (compressing the impressing) Weh (expressing the compressed impression).
Try filling your chest; then notice that even at full capacity your lungs allow the struggle of further compression; which ends in the relief of expression. Next step...adaptation like this to perceivable momentum of motion. And that's just breathing...every aspect of form within the momentum of flow operates like this.
f) IN- (within) to UN- (undo within) aka living (in-) within dying (un-)
g) In Japanese it would be..."Nippon (Nihon); Gaijin"
h) wakaru is already been fully subverted by the parasitic few aka "Wakaru is a Japanese verb meaning: to understand, to see, to follow 分かる. We believe you need to know and, when you know, you change. Let us help in the process and we will build future together."... https://www.wakaru.eu/wakaru.html
They suggest understanding together with perceiving; following while ignoring resisting; believing suggested instead of growing comprehension of perceivable; want for outcomes over need to adapt to origin, and always the "we" over the ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). They use "we" as an umbrella (the idolatry of the word itself) to tempt the many to consent to e pluribus unum (out of many one); while destroying perceivable differences in the process of their ignorance towards nature differentiating itself.
Gnosis is of course knowledge
a) GNOSTIC (perceiving perceivable inspiration aka to know) or GNOSTICISM (consenting to stand under suggested information)...based on ones choice within balance (need/want).
b) "is of course" ignores being within the course (inception towards death); while lacking to comprehend what "is" already perceivable. One cannot define what is; only respond to it; yet one can suggest others to consent to definitions if they ignore what perceivable already is.
Think is obvious because it has the "thorn"
I like the implication of struggle to overcome thorn to reach blossom aka blossoming comprehension of perceivable; while struggling within the thorny temptations of suggestion.
This is a neat site...
Nice a fresh tool...my face when realizing I not only have it bookmarked already; but also have it open in another tab right now... https://pic8.co/sh/mfThWq.jpg
a) KIN (alike) represents the reaction of differences (living) within sameness (dying).
b) KNOW (knowledge; perceivable) implies the differentiation of ALL perceivable into each ONE perceiving it from within.
c) THNIK (subjected to objectifying) implies thinking in response to perceivable or suggested. A reaction to enacting or ignoring it for the reactions of others.
d) COMPREHEND (compressed out of impressing) aka comprehension shaped out of perceivable input (inspiration) aka IN (within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka form to flow adaptation) -ATION (through action).
e) UNDERSTAND (standing under) aka standing under suggested input (information) aka IN (within) FORM (formed by flow) -ATION (thorough action).
Compressing (comprehension) of impressing (perception) implies through adaptation (spirit). One can learn this by breathing aka impression to compression for expression or repression. The more one trains compression; the more one can express of the impressing.
This ties back to the use of suggested words to tempt one to ignore the perceivable impression, like "YHWH". Instead of speaking it as a suggested word; try breathing it as perceivable sound? Notice Yah (breathing in the impressing); Hah (compressing the impressing) Weh (expressing the compressed impression).
Try filling your chest; then notice that even at full capacity your lungs allow the struggle of further compression; which ends in the relief of expression. Next step...adaptation like this to perceivable momentum of motion. And that's just breathing...every aspect of form within the momentum of flow operates like this.
f) IN- (within) to UN- (undo within) aka living (in-) within dying (un-)
g) In Japanese it would be..."Nippon (Nihon); Gaijin"
h) wakaru is already been fully subverted by the parasitic few aka "Wakaru is a Japanese verb meaning: to understand, to see, to follow 分かる. We believe you need to know and, when you know, you change. Let us help in the process and we will build future together."... https://www.wakaru.eu/wakaru.html
They suggest understanding together with perceiving; following while ignoring resisting; believing suggested instead of growing comprehension of perceivable; want for outcomes over need to adapt to origin, and always the "we" over the ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). They use "we" as an umbrella (the idolatry of the word itself) to tempt the many to consent to e pluribus unum (out of many one); while destroying perceivable differences in the process of their ignorance towards nature differentiating itself.
a) GNOSTIC (perceiving perceivable inspiration aka to know) or GNOSTICISM (consenting to stand under suggested information)...based on ones choice within balance (need/want).
b) "is of course" ignores being within the course (inception towards death); while lacking to comprehend what "is" already perceivable. One cannot define what is; only respond to it; yet one can suggest others to consent to definitions if they ignore what perceivable already is.
I like the implication of struggle to overcome thorn to reach blossom aka blossoming comprehension of perceivable; while struggling within the thorny temptations of suggestion.
Nice a fresh tool...my face when realizing I not only have it bookmarked already; but also have it open in another tab right now... https://pic8.co/sh/mfThWq.jpg