Thank you for a human response, apologies for the tactic I used to prompt it.
I learned that the more one grows comprehension; the easier it becomes for others to suggest dehumanization; since those who comprehend perceivable (inspiration) deviate from the the norm of suggested (information).
Furthermore; to adapt to inspiration and to write for others (suggesting information) mostly tempts them to ignore perceivable for suggested. Expressing inspiration on the other hand requires one to resist the temptation of others who want endless information suggested to them; who want others to conform to the accepted norm of communication; who want confirmation, and who endlessly want more.
If you have not read this before... (I just did)
a) "language is a natural growth"...growth represents ones resistance within all sound; hence resonance (need) over dissonance (want). Utilizing words and languages to suggest meaning represents dissonance within perceivable sound. Energy utilizes sound for internal growth (resonance) within loss (dissonance).
Notice that other lifeforms don't reason about the meaning of suggested words; they individually resonate with collectively perceivable sound. Be outside before the sun rises and you can witness how all the lifeforms around you are waking up by individually finding balance; resonating with their surroundings. Same when spending a night in the woods...a constant background noise; but if you add a different noise to it; everything adapts on the fly in caution before going back to balance. Same with disrupting water etc.
b) "words as an instrument to shape our own purposes"...that ignores that shaping is done by choice, hence in response to enacting balance. Sound sets instruments into itself by self differentiation aka temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Furthermore; if velocity (flow) meets resistance (form) within momentum (balance); then that implies friction and resonance as communication in-between.
c) "decline of language"...setting dissonance (words) into resonance (sound) represents a temporary noise within an ongoing harmony. Living represents temporary chaos within the ongoing natural order of dying aka growth within loss. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto the temporary; while ignoring to resist the ongoing, hence transmuting form back to flow.
d) "an effect can become a cause"...the foundation of living (effect) represents dying (cause), and so if living ignores to resist dying, then the ignored, ongoing cause will resolve the temporary effect.
e) "foolish thoughts"...consenting to suggested words "saves" them within conscious memory; which in return corrupts the consciousness to operate within the confines of self imposed restrictions (information); instead free roaming within all perceivable inspiration; while fetching connections for comprehension to express growth. Such a memory filled with words; which tempts one to remember (respond to memory; while ignoring the ongoing system) represents the "ego" and the parasitic few suggest endless information to feed it.
f) "the process is reversible"...being processed implies being resistance within. One cannot go back; one needs to adapt to ongoing origin; hence resonating with it; balancing as choice within its center.
g) "spread by imitation"...the perceiving can only imitate perceivable; hence each one expressing oneness. The issue stems from ignoring this for the suggestions of others; which implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka willingly consent to imitate a substitute source to perceivable reality.
h) "thinking more clearly"...aka expressing comprehension of perceivable inspiration; instead of regressing through perpetuation of suggested information.
i) "the fight against bad English"...ignores that there's no fault within perceivable sound; only the ignorant reactions by the instruments within, who lack comprehension of how to express what sound is offering; hence representing growth potential to learn from the noise they're making.
j) "metaphor"...suggested information represents a metaphor (transfer) for perceivable inspiration; yet adds the ignorance of perceivable from those making the suggestions.
k) "operators"...ignores being the reaction within the enacting operation of dying. Ones strength (Latin operor; heb; strength) stems from resisting the enacting operation perceived; not suggesting operators to each other.
l) "pretentious diction" originates from ignoring that to be (living) implies out of (dying); hence within and in response to. One cannot pretend to be without ignoring being out of origin.
m) "meaningless words"...aka perceivable meaning (sound) or suggested meaning (words). All the conflicts about meaning are caused by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need). All meaning is predefined and offered towards perception; while ones lack of comprehension thereof represents the growth potential within the loss of potentiality...unless ignored.
n) "the whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness"...aka suggested complexity (words) over perceivable simplicity (sound).
o) "picking out words for the sake of their meaning"...implies consenting to suggested meaning (words) over perceivable meaning (sound) aka fiction shaped by others over reality expressed through self.
p) "people dislike one thing and want solidarity with another"... aka want vs not want (suggested) while ignoring need (perceivable).
q) "a writer will ask himself"...ignores that the one perceiving doesn't have to ask questions towards all perceivable; he needs to adapt to the perceivable, which would grow his comprehension about it. Seeking answers implies something is missing, yet all is already perceivable, and ones lack of comprehension represents ignored potential of the one growing it. A seed (living) already contains everything it could be, yet it has to grow within the soil (dying) to express it. The issue with temporary growth...it happens within ongoing loss, and so the struggle to resist is demanded for growth within loss.
r) "politics"...the foundation thereof represents choice (consent) to choice (suggested voting) contract law; hence willingly consent to submit to the will of others, while ignoring that choice represents the center of a balance based system. Placing choice under the suggesting choices of others represents ignoring perceivable balance, while also shirking response-ability (choice) to it. Choice contracted to choice also represents being "bound anew" aka Latin religio, which puts politics and religion together. Whatever information politics and religions are suggesting are mere distractions and sales-pitches for the contract law.
s) "let the meaning choose the word"...what words does nature choose to express sound to all within? It's the flowing nature that sets the formed choice within itself; which only then allows the shaping of suggestible words out of perceivable sound.
t) "probably it's better to put off using words for as long as possible"...no shit; Sherlock. Resisting such a temptation on the other hand...that's a struggle very few are willing to choose.
u) "never use a long word where a short one will do"...what about "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"?
Do not fall into the trap of ignorance of the recent "spelling is casting a SPELL
The trap represents suggested information; which one triggers by consenting to it. Casting a spell represent suggesting words to tempt others to ignore perceivable sound for it. If they do, then their spelling can be crafted (defined; redefined and contradicted) by suggestion. When one uses words to express, then one consents to restrict expression into a controlled environment by the suggested words of others.
How many of the words you're using have you shaped out of sound by yourself? If you actually did; then that implies that the power of these words requires the consent of others to your suggested meaning thereof. If you try that you will noticed that the parasitic few don't much like competition within mass population control.
As for ignorance...the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents ignorance. Everyone falls for it, since struggling to resist the temptation of want represents the need to sustain self. The many are being domesticated to view ignorance as a judgment upon self and others; which tempts them to ignore balance (need/want) for their responding choice at the center aka responsibility (need) or ignorance (want). Those who ignore need for want; ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want), hence all the conflicts.
The power of language is...
...impressing sound meeting repressing choice to shape it.
it is in the 'story' that is told
a) each ONE (perceiving) represents the story of ALL (perceivable) aka the expression/repression of ALL potentiality through each ONEs potential within. A seed expressing what the soil has to offer through its own growth.
b) nature doesn't narrate; it impresses; which demands adaptation from those within. Living represents the expression within the momentum of dying. One can sugarcoat this with suggested words; yet the responsibility to the perceivable process can only be ignored for a short while before the suggested narration falls apart; gets dissolved; is being transmuted back to base.
c) does "self" discernment imply the need of others telling you suggested stories about the who; where; what and why of your existence? What if growing comprehension within all perceivable represents the responsibility of one-self; while resisting the temptation of suggested his-story by others?
d) what if all that was is accumulated within all that is? What if all that is can be shaped by responding choice into all that could be? What if choice represents the gatekeeper for all that will be? Why is the center of existence (ones choice within all perceivable balance) never mentioned in suggested his-story?
'sense' of the way it is written
Sensing represents by the perceiving (life) within the way (inception towards death) of all perceivable. Not much writing in velocity until the resistance within ignores resisting for scribbling down notes to suggest others "the way".
Word origin alone is interesting as a thing to study but does not create meaning in the way that expressing an idea does.
a) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything). One shapes words out of sound already available, hence transmutation of ingredient (word) out of base (sound)...not creation by creator.
b) reaction (perceiving) cannot define meaning of enacting (perceivable)...unless ignorance is offered as choice.
c) IDE'A, noun [Greek to see, Latin video.] ...aka perceivable (through seeing) or suggested (as video); depending on responding choice. Consider if the "rec" symbolism on a VHS recorder and the red-dot (bindi) on the forehead tempts one to ignore the perceivable symbol of memory; which is where one saves suggested information when consenting to it?
d) expression of idea (perceivable or suggested) implies by free will of choice in response to balance (need) or imbalance (want).
it can be a fun challenge (and useful to improve vocabulary usage) to write a sentence and then change as many of the Latin rooted words to Greek rooted ones. It is even harder to change either to as many Germano-English (Saxon as Orwell says) words as possible
Adaptation to inspiration; yet within the confinement of suggested information. I try to utilize any suggested root (choice of words); while expressing my comprehension of the perceivable foundation (sound). You want to improve suggested vocabulary; I need to resist the suggestion of meaning (words); while adapting to perceivable meaning (sound).
I learned that the more one grows comprehension; the easier it becomes for others to suggest dehumanization; since those who comprehend perceivable (inspiration) deviate from the the norm of suggested (information).
Furthermore; to adapt to inspiration and to write for others (suggesting information) mostly tempts them to ignore perceivable for suggested. Expressing inspiration on the other hand requires one to resist the temptation of others who want endless information suggested to them; who want others to conform to the accepted norm of communication; who want confirmation, and who endlessly want more.
a) "language is a natural growth"...growth represents ones resistance within all sound; hence resonance (need) over dissonance (want). Utilizing words and languages to suggest meaning represents dissonance within perceivable sound. Energy utilizes sound for internal growth (resonance) within loss (dissonance).
Notice that other lifeforms don't reason about the meaning of suggested words; they individually resonate with collectively perceivable sound. Be outside before the sun rises and you can witness how all the lifeforms around you are waking up by individually finding balance; resonating with their surroundings. Same when spending a night in the woods...a constant background noise; but if you add a different noise to it; everything adapts on the fly in caution before going back to balance. Same with disrupting water etc.
b) "words as an instrument to shape our own purposes"...that ignores that shaping is done by choice, hence in response to enacting balance. Sound sets instruments into itself by self differentiation aka temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Furthermore; if velocity (flow) meets resistance (form) within momentum (balance); then that implies friction and resonance as communication in-between.
c) "decline of language"...setting dissonance (words) into resonance (sound) represents a temporary noise within an ongoing harmony. Living represents temporary chaos within the ongoing natural order of dying aka growth within loss. The parasitic few suggest the many to hold onto the temporary; while ignoring to resist the ongoing, hence transmuting form back to flow.
d) "an effect can become a cause"...the foundation of living (effect) represents dying (cause), and so if living ignores to resist dying, then the ignored, ongoing cause will resolve the temporary effect.
e) "foolish thoughts"...consenting to suggested words "saves" them within conscious memory; which in return corrupts the consciousness to operate within the confines of self imposed restrictions (information); instead free roaming within all perceivable inspiration; while fetching connections for comprehension to express growth. Such a memory filled with words; which tempts one to remember (respond to memory; while ignoring the ongoing system) represents the "ego" and the parasitic few suggest endless information to feed it.
f) "the process is reversible"...being processed implies being resistance within. One cannot go back; one needs to adapt to ongoing origin; hence resonating with it; balancing as choice within its center.
g) "spread by imitation"...the perceiving can only imitate perceivable; hence each one expressing oneness. The issue stems from ignoring this for the suggestions of others; which implies choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka willingly consent to imitate a substitute source to perceivable reality.
h) "thinking more clearly"...aka expressing comprehension of perceivable inspiration; instead of regressing through perpetuation of suggested information.
i) "the fight against bad English"...ignores that there's no fault within perceivable sound; only the ignorant reactions by the instruments within, who lack comprehension of how to express what sound is offering; hence representing growth potential to learn from the noise they're making.
j) "metaphor"...suggested information represents a metaphor (transfer) for perceivable inspiration; yet adds the ignorance of perceivable from those making the suggestions.
k) "operators"...ignores being the reaction within the enacting operation of dying. Ones strength (Latin operor; heb; strength) stems from resisting the enacting operation perceived; not suggesting operators to each other.
l) "pretentious diction" originates from ignoring that to be (living) implies out of (dying); hence within and in response to. One cannot pretend to be without ignoring being out of origin.
m) "meaningless words"...aka perceivable meaning (sound) or suggested meaning (words). All the conflicts about meaning are caused by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need). All meaning is predefined and offered towards perception; while ones lack of comprehension thereof represents the growth potential within the loss of potentiality...unless ignored.
n) "the whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness"...aka suggested complexity (words) over perceivable simplicity (sound).
o) "picking out words for the sake of their meaning"...implies consenting to suggested meaning (words) over perceivable meaning (sound) aka fiction shaped by others over reality expressed through self.
p) "people dislike one thing and want solidarity with another"... aka want vs not want (suggested) while ignoring need (perceivable).
q) "a writer will ask himself"...ignores that the one perceiving doesn't have to ask questions towards all perceivable; he needs to adapt to the perceivable, which would grow his comprehension about it. Seeking answers implies something is missing, yet all is already perceivable, and ones lack of comprehension represents ignored potential of the one growing it. A seed (living) already contains everything it could be, yet it has to grow within the soil (dying) to express it. The issue with temporary growth...it happens within ongoing loss, and so the struggle to resist is demanded for growth within loss.
r) "politics"...the foundation thereof represents choice (consent) to choice (suggested voting) contract law; hence willingly consent to submit to the will of others, while ignoring that choice represents the center of a balance based system. Placing choice under the suggesting choices of others represents ignoring perceivable balance, while also shirking response-ability (choice) to it. Choice contracted to choice also represents being "bound anew" aka Latin religio, which puts politics and religion together. Whatever information politics and religions are suggesting are mere distractions and sales-pitches for the contract law.
s) "let the meaning choose the word"...what words does nature choose to express sound to all within? It's the flowing nature that sets the formed choice within itself; which only then allows the shaping of suggestible words out of perceivable sound.
t) "probably it's better to put off using words for as long as possible"...no shit; Sherlock. Resisting such a temptation on the other hand...that's a struggle very few are willing to choose.
u) "never use a long word where a short one will do"...what about "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"?
The trap represents suggested information; which one triggers by consenting to it. Casting a spell represent suggesting words to tempt others to ignore perceivable sound for it. If they do, then their spelling can be crafted (defined; redefined and contradicted) by suggestion. When one uses words to express, then one consents to restrict expression into a controlled environment by the suggested words of others.
How many of the words you're using have you shaped out of sound by yourself? If you actually did; then that implies that the power of these words requires the consent of others to your suggested meaning thereof. If you try that you will noticed that the parasitic few don't much like competition within mass population control.
As for ignorance...the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents ignorance. Everyone falls for it, since struggling to resist the temptation of want represents the need to sustain self. The many are being domesticated to view ignorance as a judgment upon self and others; which tempts them to ignore balance (need/want) for their responding choice at the center aka responsibility (need) or ignorance (want). Those who ignore need for want; ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want), hence all the conflicts.
...impressing sound meeting repressing choice to shape it.
a) each ONE (perceiving) represents the story of ALL (perceivable) aka the expression/repression of ALL potentiality through each ONEs potential within. A seed expressing what the soil has to offer through its own growth.
b) nature doesn't narrate; it impresses; which demands adaptation from those within. Living represents the expression within the momentum of dying. One can sugarcoat this with suggested words; yet the responsibility to the perceivable process can only be ignored for a short while before the suggested narration falls apart; gets dissolved; is being transmuted back to base.
c) does "self" discernment imply the need of others telling you suggested stories about the who; where; what and why of your existence? What if growing comprehension within all perceivable represents the responsibility of one-self; while resisting the temptation of suggested his-story by others?
d) what if all that was is accumulated within all that is? What if all that is can be shaped by responding choice into all that could be? What if choice represents the gatekeeper for all that will be? Why is the center of existence (ones choice within all perceivable balance) never mentioned in suggested his-story?
Sensing represents by the perceiving (life) within the way (inception towards death) of all perceivable. Not much writing in velocity until the resistance within ignores resisting for scribbling down notes to suggest others "the way".
a) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything). One shapes words out of sound already available, hence transmutation of ingredient (word) out of base (sound)...not creation by creator.
b) reaction (perceiving) cannot define meaning of enacting (perceivable)...unless ignorance is offered as choice.
c) IDE'A, noun [Greek to see, Latin video.] ...aka perceivable (through seeing) or suggested (as video); depending on responding choice. Consider if the "rec" symbolism on a VHS recorder and the red-dot (bindi) on the forehead tempts one to ignore the perceivable symbol of memory; which is where one saves suggested information when consenting to it?
d) expression of idea (perceivable or suggested) implies by free will of choice in response to balance (need) or imbalance (want).
Adaptation to inspiration; yet within the confinement of suggested information. I try to utilize any suggested root (choice of words); while expressing my comprehension of the perceivable foundation (sound). You want to improve suggested vocabulary; I need to resist the suggestion of meaning (words); while adapting to perceivable meaning (sound).