One plus one equals two? I represent one; you represent one...we ain't equal; we're different. "two" does not represent a perceivable state; but the suggestion that counting perceivable ones (differences) together represents equality (sameness). This deception is all part of E Pluribus Unum (out of many one); which represents the suggested inversion of reality aka oneness (perceivable) self differentiating into many ones (perceiving).
Show me "two" things without each "one" of them existing within a different position? We cannot perceive sameness; only differences; yet others can tempt us to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness.
One plus one equals two? I represent one; you represent one...we ain't equal; we're different. "two" does not represent a perceivable state; but the suggestion that counting perceivable ones (differences) together represents equality (sameness). This deception is all part of E Pluribus Unum (out of many one); which represents the suggested inversion of reality aka oneness (perceivable) self differentiating into many ones (perceiving).
Show me "two" things without each "one" of them existing within a different position? We cannot perceive sameness; only differences; yet others can tempt us to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness.