All of these videos and claims of 24 hour south pole sun must be fake?
I am not sure. I’ve even encountered some who claim the 24 hour sun in the arctic is also fake.
Many, like yourself, have found “anomalies” in the footage that exists for antarctica - which in and of itself is interesting.
In any case, wether there is a 24 hour sun in the winter (their summer) in the antarctic is irrelevant to the shape of the world.
There are many flawed models (strawman models) that we are intended to adopt as independent researchers so that they may be disproven to discredit us. Only accept as true/correct what you have personally verified/validated thoroughly first!
To any with an interest in the subject, please join us on the community I created to exchange our views on it!
i dont think you have ever encountered someone who claimed the 24 hour sun in the artic is fake
Not “irl”, no - and, due to poe’s law, I could have misinterpreted them - but ostensibly yes, I did encounter them! I’d have to check my old messages to figure out who it was - but it was on this site.
You don't understand how the lack of the 24 hour sun in the Antarctic proves that the earth cannot be a sphere.
I think I understand why you think it does, but I don’t think you have considered the possibility that the world could be flat AND have a 24 hour sun in the antarctic.
One is not necessarily dependent on the other, nor would the lack of an antarctic sun prove that the world were spherical. The lights in the sky do what they do, the land is separate. In order to measure the shape of the land, we must measure the land! Not observe lights in the sky (the opposite direction) and then infer based on unvalidated assumption! Right?
I am not sure. I’ve even encountered some who claim the 24 hour sun in the arctic is also fake.
Many, like yourself, have found “anomalies” in the footage that exists for antarctica - which in and of itself is interesting.
In any case, wether there is a 24 hour sun in the winter (their summer) in the antarctic is irrelevant to the shape of the world.
There are many flawed models (strawman models) that we are intended to adopt as independent researchers so that they may be disproven to discredit us. Only accept as true/correct what you have personally verified/validated thoroughly first!
To any with an interest in the subject, please join us on the community I created to exchange our views on it!
Not “irl”, no - and, due to poe’s law, I could have misinterpreted them - but ostensibly yes, I did encounter them! I’d have to check my old messages to figure out who it was - but it was on this site.
I think I understand why you think it does, but I don’t think you have considered the possibility that the world could be flat AND have a 24 hour sun in the antarctic.
One is not necessarily dependent on the other, nor would the lack of an antarctic sun prove that the world were spherical. The lights in the sky do what they do, the land is separate. In order to measure the shape of the land, we must measure the land! Not observe lights in the sky (the opposite direction) and then infer based on unvalidated assumption! Right?