Its like reuse vs recycle. Reusing what we have learned creates growth
RE (respond to) USE (being used) + RE (response to) CYCLE (being cyclical). The temporary living responding to the ongoing process of dying implies resisting it; which in return grows resistance.
we recycle our knowledge though the media and history, by trusting our governments, or our corporation, to keep our information
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration. What you describe represents INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligo) - "to understand" aka to stand under suggested information.
b) media (latin medius; middle) aka the suggestion (information) as the middleman between choice and perception (inspiration).
c) his-story...a suggestion excluding your story as the one perceiving within all perceivable.
d) trust aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka the inversion of perceivable balance (offered to perception) to choice (response of perceiving) natural law.
e) govern (to control) ment (mens; mind; memory)...to consent to suggested information allows others to control the meaning of the information upheld within ones memory.
f) corporation aka corpus oration (whisper of the death); an allegory for those who utter in the tongue of suggested information (words); while ignoring perceivable inspiration (sound).
g) what could the temporary living "keep" within the ongoing process of dying? Does life need to keep or is life tempted to want to keep what other life suggests?
to keep our information and provide it to any of us
Is there at any moment in existence an interruption in the supply of perceivable inspiration?
recreate new
How could the ones perceiving within all perceivable experience "new creation" if all perceivable has to exist for the ones within to be able to perceive it? Could it be that the few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow?
which doesn't cost anything
What's the cost of temporary evaluation (perceiving) within ongoing value (perceivable) and could suggestion be used to tempt the perceiving to consent to ignore the perceivable (reality) for the suggested (fiction)?
most of us are all leasing cars
Aka temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) aka a vessel within the momentum of motion.
RE doesn't have to mean respond. In this case, it means repeat.
REPE'AT, verb transitive [Latin repeto; re and peto, to make at or drive towards.] - "to do, make, attempt or utter again; to iterate; as, to repeat an action"
To repeat to an action implies "reacting" to it; hence REsponding to enacted aka as the reacting form (life) to enacted flow (inception towards death).
The problem here is that you consent to suggested words as representation for meaning. You are tempted to ignore that perceivable sound represents the meaning for any suggestible words shaped in response to it. Before suggested word comes perceivable sound.
Perceivable (inspiration) represents meaning; suggested (information) represents idolized meaning; shaped by the will of the few; who utilize it to control the will of the consenting many. If you consent to the spell-craft of suggested words over perceivable sound then you consent to others defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and deliberately contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of any suggested word for you. In other words...you consent to others shaping perceivable reality (sound) with suggested fiction (words).
You are repeating the words others are suggesting; hence responding to choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceivable balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
I can't follow you on this, its not a style of writing that helps me understand the greater point you may or may not be making
a) you are tempted to "follow" the suggested information by others; yet you ignore that life represents the resistance to being moved towards death. Following leaders implies towards death, hence others utilizing suggestion to tempt you to follow leaders towards death; which allows them to racketeer your self destruction and lack of resistance.
b) understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others; which ignores you growing your comprehension out of all perceivable inspiration by adaptation to it.
c) to point implies towards the end; what I write about represents the ignored origin one needs to adapt to. I don't suggest others by pointing towards; I question the foundation of existence that the many are tempted to ignore for the suggestion of the few.
but most of your sentences arw pretty
I try to strip language of all the parasitic rhetoric used to tempt others to ignore the underlying foundation aka the moving system (perceivable sound) underneath the affixed idol (suggested words), yet only oneself can choose need (perceivable) over want (suggested) and so while this is highly effective for me to grow my own comprehension, I cannot choose for others to grow their own comprehension of perceivable reality; while resisting the temptation of suggested fiction. I can only strip the temptations away.
there are lots of insightful components
Try to utilize need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information, and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing etc.). It's about what you choose to shape out of perceivable; not about what others suggest it means.
a) living represents the reaction within enacted upon dying.
b) animal (anima) aka animated by; people (person; per sonos) aka by sound
c) life is being moved from inception towards death; within it can only RE (respond to) MOVE (being moved).
One doesn't stop life as an "instrument of conveyance" to be able to investigate or study it; one needs to adapt to being moved as to sustain life.
RE (respond to) USE (being used) + RE (response to) CYCLE (being cyclical). The temporary living responding to the ongoing process of dying implies resisting it; which in return grows resistance.
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration. What you describe represents INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligo) - "to understand" aka to stand under suggested information.
b) media (latin medius; middle) aka the suggestion (information) as the middleman between choice and perception (inspiration).
c) his-story...a suggestion excluding your story as the one perceiving within all perceivable.
d) trust aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka the inversion of perceivable balance (offered to perception) to choice (response of perceiving) natural law.
e) govern (to control) ment (mens; mind; memory)...to consent to suggested information allows others to control the meaning of the information upheld within ones memory.
f) corporation aka corpus oration (whisper of the death); an allegory for those who utter in the tongue of suggested information (words); while ignoring perceivable inspiration (sound).
g) what could the temporary living "keep" within the ongoing process of dying? Does life need to keep or is life tempted to want to keep what other life suggests?
Is there at any moment in existence an interruption in the supply of perceivable inspiration?
How could the ones perceiving within all perceivable experience "new creation" if all perceivable has to exist for the ones within to be able to perceive it? Could it be that the few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow?
What's the cost of temporary evaluation (perceiving) within ongoing value (perceivable) and could suggestion be used to tempt the perceiving to consent to ignore the perceivable (reality) for the suggested (fiction)?
Aka temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) aka a vessel within the momentum of motion.
To repeat to an action implies "reacting" to it; hence REsponding to enacted aka as the reacting form (life) to enacted flow (inception towards death).
The problem here is that you consent to suggested words as representation for meaning. You are tempted to ignore that perceivable sound represents the meaning for any suggestible words shaped in response to it. Before suggested word comes perceivable sound.
Perceivable (inspiration) represents meaning; suggested (information) represents idolized meaning; shaped by the will of the few; who utilize it to control the will of the consenting many. If you consent to the spell-craft of suggested words over perceivable sound then you consent to others defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and deliberately contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of any suggested word for you. In other words...you consent to others shaping perceivable reality (sound) with suggested fiction (words).
You are repeating the words others are suggesting; hence responding to choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceivable balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
a) you are tempted to "follow" the suggested information by others; yet you ignore that life represents the resistance to being moved towards death. Following leaders implies towards death, hence others utilizing suggestion to tempt you to follow leaders towards death; which allows them to racketeer your self destruction and lack of resistance.
b) understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others; which ignores you growing your comprehension out of all perceivable inspiration by adaptation to it.
c) to point implies towards the end; what I write about represents the ignored origin one needs to adapt to. I don't suggest others by pointing towards; I question the foundation of existence that the many are tempted to ignore for the suggestion of the few.
I try to strip language of all the parasitic rhetoric used to tempt others to ignore the underlying foundation aka the moving system (perceivable sound) underneath the affixed idol (suggested words), yet only oneself can choose need (perceivable) over want (suggested) and so while this is highly effective for me to grow my own comprehension, I cannot choose for others to grow their own comprehension of perceivable reality; while resisting the temptation of suggested fiction. I can only strip the temptations away.
Try to utilize need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information, and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing etc.). It's about what you choose to shape out of perceivable; not about what others suggest it means.