You are either retarded.... seriously incapable of self control....ie. super super excited and not realising it.... Or.....you are trying to be antagonistic....not exactly....wise thing...frankly....it shows you don't have complete understanding otherwise you would be far more willing to take some time.and explain it....since you cannot...it's either not important (I think it is...) Or you are unable to
.....
More likely the latter.
I have not said it's a globe you fu king idiot.....
I said there is no proof to either.....you cannot provide proof and neither can the globe people....
Don't scapegoat one idiot to defend another....you are the idiot still...so are they unless you acknowledge your own shortcomings and ignorancee.....
Proof is not coincidence....nor is it stupid vague statements with Photoshop behind....
Seriously....selling inspiration posters....that's all you need... proof....they are not though...lmao
He doesn't have the camera setup properly for perspective.....he needs to make a globe with a max draw distance and relative scale to the projection.....
That balloon is monstrously large.
I have done work with 3D graphics programming....you need to make it modelled correctly.... I can make impossible things happen in renderings...
I have stated quite concisely why I cannot.....and let me just say it so it's said....not being able to debunk something means more about the person than it does about the debunk or the proof.....
Someone....could fail to debunk something....because they do not possess the knowledge...not because it's no debunkable....your appealing to an imaginary authority (your own fallable logic)
You haven't proven anything...not to anyone but your own opinions....not logically either....just through belief.....
You replaced one belief with another....not the absence of belief lol.
You believe your equipment is accurate....but why should it? It uses electronics which depend on Maxwell's equations which depends on Newton ultimately....
So why does one set of math work, but the others are not qualified....
No offense....but I have yet to see any one provide anything but a reductive argument.....and reduction is not proof ..... Its based on.... ASSUMPTIONS
I haven't said a fucking you just regurgitated from your wet sack of fat....
In fact... I have the only fucking example experiment that is simple, doesnt need some fucking camera to do....and can be done at any fuxki g scale.... You are a fucking idiot....determined....and sure of yourself...but not any more prepared to provide proof. You didn't even acknowledge my experiment...
Any holes in my idea...or you are so sure you don't need to repeat experience...because....your memories are golden ...
Observe the free fall in atmosphere....map that shit out.....deal the fucking density if you must....but make the fucking math work you idiot....or don't have proof...you have conjecture.....
Dumb fuxks like you make flat earth look stupid.....not me...I am willing to jump to first fucking ship that can fucking port....but you have no ship to port and yet have renounced another imaginary ship....
You are either retarded.... seriously incapable of self control....ie. super super excited and not realising it.... Or.....you are trying to be antagonistic....not exactly....wise thing...frankly....it shows you don't have complete understanding otherwise you would be far more willing to take some time.and explain it....since you cannot...it's either not important (I think it is...) Or you are unable to .....
More likely the latter.
I have not said it's a globe you fu king idiot.....
I said there is no proof to either.....you cannot provide proof and neither can the globe people....
Don't scapegoat one idiot to defend another....you are the idiot still...so are they unless you acknowledge your own shortcomings and ignorancee.....
Proof is not coincidence....nor is it stupid vague statements with Photoshop behind....
Seriously....selling inspiration posters....that's all you need... proof....they are not though...lmao
Not necessarily. Perspective also works against the argument for the same reason.
You would need to be sufficiently far away from the earth relative to the size of both you and the earth to see such a drop off.
So again, altitude becomes the question.
How do I know your balloon footage is actually that high....what if it's not?
I get it looks high.....but again....we have amazing cgi today. So making a grainy footage video of a spinning camera is not the best tbf.
Again. I am skeptical, but on both sides.
I would love to see some real proof on either side that I can myself confirm but I also do not know a way to reliably determine the altitude....
Yeah great...but then how do I measure it....
That simulation is not accurate at all.....
He doesn't have the camera setup properly for perspective.....he needs to make a globe with a max draw distance and relative scale to the projection.....
That balloon is monstrously large.
I have done work with 3D graphics programming....you need to make it modelled correctly.... I can make impossible things happen in renderings...
I have stated quite concisely why I cannot.....and let me just say it so it's said....not being able to debunk something means more about the person than it does about the debunk or the proof.....
Someone....could fail to debunk something....because they do not possess the knowledge...not because it's no debunkable....your appealing to an imaginary authority (your own fallable logic)
You haven't proven anything...not to anyone but your own opinions....not logically either....just through belief.....
You replaced one belief with another....not the absence of belief lol.
You believe your equipment is accurate....but why should it? It uses electronics which depend on Maxwell's equations which depends on Newton ultimately....
So why does one set of math work, but the others are not qualified....
No offense....but I have yet to see any one provide anything but a reductive argument.....and reduction is not proof ..... Its based on.... ASSUMPTIONS
Stfu... You dumb fuck.
Don't be disingenuous to me you fuck....
I haven't said a fucking you just regurgitated from your wet sack of fat....
In fact... I have the only fucking example experiment that is simple, doesnt need some fucking camera to do....and can be done at any fuxki g scale.... You are a fucking idiot....determined....and sure of yourself...but not any more prepared to provide proof. You didn't even acknowledge my experiment...
Any holes in my idea...or you are so sure you don't need to repeat experience...because....your memories are golden ...
Observe the free fall in atmosphere....map that shit out.....deal the fucking density if you must....but make the fucking math work you idiot....or don't have proof...you have conjecture.....
Dumb fuxks like you make flat earth look stupid.....not me...I am willing to jump to first fucking ship that can fucking port....but you have no ship to port and yet have renounced another imaginary ship....