Here was a study in Italy that examined frozen blood samples collected during a cancer screening trial in 2019.
Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176598/
Click on figure 1 table to expand it.
You can see 10% of the blood samples collected in the first week of September 2019 tested positive for sars-cov-2 antibodies. (The red line).
This proved the entire Covid narrative was a lie. It did not start at a Wuhan outbreak in December and if you do the math, just from what we know about the speed of the spread while it was being monitored in 2020, for it to have already reached 10% of the Italian population by September 2019, It had long since reached 100% of the developed world by the end of 2020. Most did not realize that because at least 75% of sars-cov-2 infections did not produce the covid19 respiratory symptoms so they were essentially asymptomatic.
So what does this mean for the vaccines? It means they were entirely useless as a prevention or even as a symptom suppression. It is impossible that exposure to the vaccine induced spike protein could create more of an immunity than exposure to the real virus that contained that same spike protein as well as many other antigens that the immune system could latch on to.
So I am not discussing here anything that the general scientific community does not already know. They are all aware of that Italian study. They all know it is just not possible that any significant section of the population was not already exposed to the virus before the vaccines were rolled out.
This means they are all involved in perpetuating the lies. That is why none of them ever even discuss the fact there never was any antibody surveillance of the population to see if they even needed vaccination before they were all involved in promoting the vaccine mandates.
They have all been blowing smoke and they all know it.
THEY WERE ALL INVOLVED IN TRYING TO FORCE THOSE VACCINES ON THE GLOBAL POPULATION THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN EXPOSED TO THE VIRUS AND NONE OF THEM ARE SAYING WHY THEY DID THAT.
So I'll tell you why. It is called blame shifting. The virus really was created in a lab. It belongs to the US government and they know its long term effects will devastate the human race so they do not want to carry the can for it. This is why they created the warp speed, liability exempt vaccines and tried to force them on the global population. They needed everyone vaccinated because they intend for all the long term effects of the sars-cov-2 virus to be blamed on those vaccines. If the could get that jab into everyone and get them to believe the vaccines are the cause of all their ills, the vaccine's liability exempt status will ensure no one will ever be held responsible for what they did in their bio-research labs.
I remember it was like October and the Mysterious sickness which made your lungs look like ground glass (outbreak centered around fort detrick) was being blamed on weed pens.
Wrong takeaway. If there’s one thing to takeaway from this “pandemic”, it’s that false positives are incredibly easy to manufacture. In the case of this “virus”, the detection was patented before any supposed isolated sample. Therefore, it’s much more likely those samples in the article were absolute bunk.
Plus, I’m pretty sure the tests were confirmed to use primers coding for non-unique sequences.
No. You think they used Walmart PCR tests or something? This paper was not authored by idiots. They are a highly qualified team of European scientists. If you read the paper you will have see they used a serological assay highly specific to sars-cov-2.
“ We investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies in blood samples of 959 asymptomatic individuals enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020 to track the date of onset, frequency, and temporal and geographic variations across the Italian regions. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies were detected in 111 of 959 (11.6%) individuals, starting from September 2019 (14%), with a cluster of positive cases (>30%) in the second week of February 2020 and the highest number (53.2%) in Lombardy. This study shows an unexpected very early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic individuals in Italy several months before the first patient was identified, and clarifies the onset and spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Finding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in asymptomatic people before the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy may reshape the history of pandemic.”
No. They used RBD-specific antibodies. That’s nice. There’s still no proof, visual or isolated of the SARS-Cov-2 virus/antibody ligand. So they’re making a post hoc assumption that the infection is around. The problem is that the antibodies produced NON-SPECIFIC, as evident by the false positive rate with antibody tests. This test proves the antibodies are non-specific, not that COVID is real/has been around forever.
I’ll change my mind if you can find an isolated, purified virus sample that was then shown to cause infection 100% of the time. It has to include spectroscopy and verifiable differentiation from autologous exosomes.
When I said read the paper I meant the whole paper not just the abstract. They purchased wild-type SARS-CoV-2 strain 2019-nCoV/Italy INMI1 and propagated in VeroE6 (ATCC-CRL1586) cell culture. The purchased purified HEK293 cell derived RBD antigen from Sino Biological. They used Human anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgM Antibody CR3022 (Native Antigen Oxford UK) and Anti Spike RBD SARS-CoV-2 human monoclonal antibody as positive controls in an RBD specific ELISA test.
All of this is described in much detail in the paper supplementary materials here https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0300891620974755
Aside from all of that, just the fact that only 10% of the samples were testing positive shows they were not detecting antibodies to common coronavirus.
Yeah I don’t care, bud. Did you find electron micrographs of said ligand binding domains interacting with a genotyped SARS-Cov2 virus that was then confirmed to be infectious? Because literally none of their ELISA/gels mean diddly squat if all they’re doing is using a kit positive control. The positive controls ARE the fucking problem as they were developed using a computer simulation of the virus uploaded to GenBank.
I think u/ImBillCurtis is trying to say the virus has never been isolated or proven to cause the symptoms of COVID. Instead, everyone has been relying on a computer model of the virus/genetic code, which is easily fucked with. Am I correct so far?
I'm open to the idea of viruses not existing, or at least not being what we've been told they are (what differentiates virus vs. exosomes? either way, there seems to be some sort of transmission amongst cells, and even organisms, no?)
But I am trying to understand u/raven9's point. Are you arguing that the antibody tests WERE specific enough to detect SARSCOV2, as opposed to SARS1 or MERS or any other coronavirus?
only 10% of the samples were testing positive shows they were not detecting antibodies to common coronavirus.
I am still unclear if the free PCR tests people get at the drive up clinic are differentiating between SARSCOV2 vs ANY coronavirus. My relatives have been getting sick a lot since their 3-4 jabs (no shit), but they keep testing negative on PCR, which I find a bit surprising.
I mean yeah you're asking some good questions the virus definately has been purified. I dont understand why anyone would deny that when all you got to do is google it.
As for the antibodies if I remember correctly the paper said they were produced by SINO right? So we can look them up.
https://www.sinobiological.com/research/virus/sars-cov-2-antibody
According to their documentation;
Anti-Spike Antibody No cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HKU1, 229E, NL63, and OC43
So yes that means highly specific to SARS-CoV-2 and no other. Not even SARS-1 or MERS
This is backwards to me. "Long covid" is newspeak for vaccine injury/side effects, not the other way around.
Could be false positive from the standard coronavirus. People forget that this virus is one source of the common cold.
Ordinary people do forget that. This highly qualified team of scientists that holds phd's and masters degrees in the relevent sciences don't. If you read the paper you will see they used serological assay highly specific to sars-cov-2.
CoVID (a disease of a disease for some reason)
Good point.
Also, "novel" means fake, fabricated.
So-called "Novel Virus"
That was why the most ludicrous conspiracy theories about the vaccines were being promoted during 2021. They were to sew those seeds of doubt, that the vaccines would start to be blamed for the long term effects of exposure to the virus. Hydra Vulgaris parasites in the vaccine shots. Graphene Hydroxide razors. Live streamers being assassinated in their kitchen for telling you about it. All manner of ridiculous shit to sew the seeds of doubt so that the vaccines would take over the enemy status from the virus. You no longer need to even care what they said about the virus because we have a new enemy...the vaxxeeeens!
I will not be surprised if they go the rug pull route. It's hinted at in SPARS report.