I was mostly referring to machine learning. The semantics of what constitutes "AI" isn't in the scope of this discussion.
4G can't handle constant surveillance streams
Well, it depends what kind of surveillance we're talking about. It absolutely could handle compressed audio from a mic in every room of every household with room to spare. Audio, especially when compressed, takes so little bandwidth, and is still immensely effective for surveillance.
It is not intended for wide constant processing, it will be stored in archives for some time.
How will it be stored? Where will it be stored? That is an astronomical amount of data. We do not have that much storage. Either it's heavily compressed and audio only and we have enough storage space for it (and already have enough bandwidth for it) or it's big enough to require 5G to facilitate, and we don't have enough storage space for it.
It absolutely could handle compressed audio from a mic in every room of every household with room to spare. Audio, especially when compressed, takes so little bandwidth, and is still immensely effective for surveillance.
Yes, but 4G is limited in number of clients for each base station. so, you will have to somehow aggregate them to one data stream and then transmit from dedicated mobile station. With 5G you can have a lot more mobile devices for single base station.
How will it be stored? Where will it be stored? That is an astronomical amount of data. We do not have that much storage.
That is why there was huge plans on all that multilevel SSDs and tiled HDDs along with unwinding 5G plans, that could store much more data than conventional devices. But now it seems they have problems with that tech, it is appeared to be less reliable than supposed.
The RF isn't dangerous to us.
It could have some health issues, but definitely not at the scale of all that 5G bullshit circulating around talking about. At least if you are not really concerned about danger of 2G/3G/4G, there are no reasons to be concerned specifically about 5G health ussies.
Aggregate them to one data stream and then transmit from a dedicated mobile station.
This would be dead easy. And if there is as much incentive to do this as to facilitate rolling out a whole new, borderline intrusive system, there is no reason this wouldn't be done. This would be a far easier option than rolling out 5G, and raise far fewer eyebrows, as it would be completely hidden.
Multilevel SSDs and tiled HDDs
Still not enough data. What you're speculating requires so much data that we could not possibly have with anything close to the current tech.
This would be a far easier option than rolling out 5G, and raise far fewer eyebrows, as it would be completely hidden.
It is possible, but all home aplliance manufacturers have to make an agreement on some protocols and hierarchy of selection some master device who will be connected with base station and collect data from other devices of other manufacturers. I think that it could be as complex as rolling out next generation.
Still not enough data. What you're speculating requires so much data that we could not possibly have with anything close to the current tech.
Overestimating tech advances is usual thing. Do you remember Moore's law? And many top parties make decisions on it. Or that hype around magneto-resistive RAM? And so on.
At the time of planning total surveilance, they take a storage capacity growth as constant. Many years later, when it comes to real implementations, that prognosis failed. So they forced development of ANNs and other stuff to reduce amount of data to store.
With the same probability they could have been failed with bandwidth expectations, or cameras resolution, f.e.
They failed whole plan of total surveillance, but still got an ability to surveil any choosen person on demand. Not that bad for them. From the other side, they occasionally succeded with marketing of that shitty voice assistants.
I was mostly referring to machine learning. The semantics of what constitutes "AI" isn't in the scope of this discussion.
Well, it depends what kind of surveillance we're talking about. It absolutely could handle compressed audio from a mic in every room of every household with room to spare. Audio, especially when compressed, takes so little bandwidth, and is still immensely effective for surveillance.
How will it be stored? Where will it be stored? That is an astronomical amount of data. We do not have that much storage. Either it's heavily compressed and audio only and we have enough storage space for it (and already have enough bandwidth for it) or it's big enough to require 5G to facilitate, and we don't have enough storage space for it.
Yep, I agree. The RF isn't dangerous to us.
Yes, but 4G is limited in number of clients for each base station. so, you will have to somehow aggregate them to one data stream and then transmit from dedicated mobile station. With 5G you can have a lot more mobile devices for single base station.
That is why there was huge plans on all that multilevel SSDs and tiled HDDs along with unwinding 5G plans, that could store much more data than conventional devices. But now it seems they have problems with that tech, it is appeared to be less reliable than supposed.
It could have some health issues, but definitely not at the scale of all that 5G bullshit circulating around talking about. At least if you are not really concerned about danger of 2G/3G/4G, there are no reasons to be concerned specifically about 5G health ussies.
This would be dead easy. And if there is as much incentive to do this as to facilitate rolling out a whole new, borderline intrusive system, there is no reason this wouldn't be done. This would be a far easier option than rolling out 5G, and raise far fewer eyebrows, as it would be completely hidden.
Still not enough data. What you're speculating requires so much data that we could not possibly have with anything close to the current tech.
It is possible, but all home aplliance manufacturers have to make an agreement on some protocols and hierarchy of selection some master device who will be connected with base station and collect data from other devices of other manufacturers. I think that it could be as complex as rolling out next generation.
Overestimating tech advances is usual thing. Do you remember Moore's law? And many top parties make decisions on it. Or that hype around magneto-resistive RAM? And so on.
At the time of planning total surveilance, they take a storage capacity growth as constant. Many years later, when it comes to real implementations, that prognosis failed. So they forced development of ANNs and other stuff to reduce amount of data to store.
With the same probability they could have been failed with bandwidth expectations, or cameras resolution, f.e.
They failed whole plan of total surveillance, but still got an ability to surveil any choosen person on demand. Not that bad for them. From the other side, they occasionally succeded with marketing of that shitty voice assistants.
Something like that.
But no less complicated than implementing surveillance into every device.