-
These people get intimidated easily, usually physically. They're attracted to your masculinity. You gotta get beefy and look as tall as you can.
-
They get intimidated with bluffs. They may be able to call out your bluff but bluff them even harder.
-
Because they're emotional, they'll keep attacking as many things to get you emotional. Getting as stoic as possible is the best way to deal with this. You'll make a fool out of someone once they get violent. It's getting real difficult with this in terms of whitefolk like I think a lot of you are.
-
You're going to have to be sharp and make many connections. I have my own intelligence agency for example. I'm still recruiting but it's getting difficult to function.
-
Because they like to attack and destroy, ban and destroy you have to be as much immune to attack as possible.
If you have any questions lads, I'll answer them to the best of my ability. What I'm talking about right now is gnosticism but I am a Christian, I believe the KJV. I have reached around the seventh dimension. I'm trying to teach as many intelligent people as I can but it's difficult dealing with emotional people.
If you're a Christian, please pray for me. I was just thinking prey sounds like pray.
Consider these within choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as haggling over which suggested fiction to consent to.
Inception towards death represents the only "way" for life; resisting it represents resisting the temptation of EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] aka to ignore being moved by it.
In other words life being moved from inception towards death represents the constant temptation to ignore resisting. Whenever one does it represents emotions.
Guilty consciousness represents the dominant weakness. If you allege to perpetrate against others; they will defend their own guilty consciousness by accusing you.
...requires adaptation to perceivable inspiration for growth of comprehension; not accumulation of suggested intel (intelligence aka standing under suggested information).
Because you're operating a pyramid scheme (a chain of command) tempting others to stand under (understanding) your suggested information; hence being put on a pedestal; while corrupting those below you.
The agency; agent (action) represents ongoing flow (inception towards death); while the temporary form within (life) represents the reaction being enacted upon. Reacting to enacted represents adaptation to perceivable...not the suggestions of other reactions.
They are being used to distract the many from comprehending flow (inception towards death); which attacks and destroys life unless resisted. The parasitic few first suggest the many endless information to hold onto (the entirety of civilization and all it encompasses); then as the many within are being corrupted by their ignorance to resist flow; the few systematically suggest the destruction of the remaining civilization to them as to tempt the old to either cling onto or want to burn down; while inspiring the young to want fresh and to rebuild and so while one civilization falls (the west); the next is being set up (China; Russia; India).
If you pray for this "Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti" (father; son; and the holy ghost); then you fell prey to this "In Nomine" (in the name of) aka the choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law by the parasitic few utilizing RELIGION (religo) "to bind anew"; hence binding your choice (consent) to their choice (suggestion).
As for "sound like"...phonetic mysticism of the kabbalah.
What are you trying to telling me with that wall of text?
Noticing the weakness can always be reverse engineered to sustain yourself (need) over the temptation to exploit others (want). Both coexist and it's your response-ability (choice) to resist one over the other.
I just adapt to what your posts inspire me to.
Information represents the issue; since suggesting it tempts want vs not want reasoning; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration (need).
"Informing you directly" ignores that direction (inception towards death) communicates itself as perceivable inspiration for the growth of comprehension by the reaction (life) within.
CENTRAL (choice as the center of perceivable balance) INTELLIGENCE (understanding aka standing under the suggested information by others) AGENCY (action aka perceivable enacted upon the reaction of perceiving).
A sleight of hand for this goes "Intel Inside" which implies suggested information inside; perceivable inspiration from outside.
Whatever information you collect and suggest to others operates in ignorance of all perceivable inspiration available to everyone at every moment. The parasitic few exploit that ignorance by suggesting the many to utilize information over inspiration. Sleight of hand: "Library of Alexandria" aka accumulate as many information as you want; it's all gonna burn within the ongoing flow of inspiration.
The few can only keep tabs on the many; by the many consenting to the suggested information of the few; which keeps them within a feedback loop. Those who choose "wanted" information over "needed" inspiration are tempted to want more...entrance the happy merchants of temptation with endless more information to reason over.
a) truth (want) implies versus false (not want); hence a conflict of reason caused by your consent (want or not want) to suggested information.
b) the aforementioned conflict (reason) contradicting your want for peace aside...temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) represents being temporary chaos in need to resist the ongoing natural order.
The parasitic few suggest the many to the inversion thereof aka seeking order out of chaos aka truth out of lies aka peace out of war.
c) "by the way we will make" ignores being those within the way (inception towards death) with the choice to remake (life).
d) MOTTO; noun (from Latin muttum "a grunt; a word," from muttire "to mutter, mumble, murmur") ignores that before the suggested word exists the perceivable sound.
That wall of text is me adapting to perceivable inspiration out of which I grow my comprehension...it does not represent suggested information for you. It is your choice of want (information) over need (inspiration) that curtails your growth of comprehension. I can point this out; yet not help you to choose otherwise; since that represents your free will of choice.
Try using implication (if/then) while resisting the temptation of reasoning (true vs false; want vs not want etc.) when reading what others write.