Understanding represents "standing under" suggested information. The origin of standing under the suggested information by others represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which tempts one to ignore that choice represents the responding center of perceivable balance (need/want). The latter (balance to choice) represents natural law as defined by the natural order (flow to form) for the resulting form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Being moved represents being within the "simple way"; ignoring this for trying to stand under suggestions makes it "complex".
many people that they are entirely unable to grasp such nuanced situations.
Because you suggest information that contradict the suggested information they already consented to. They are bound within contract law with a 3rd party; while viewing your suggestions as an opposition to it.
They neither comprehend the 3rd party (parasitic suggestions); the contract law (consent to suggested); nor the origin of the conflict with you (reasoning about suggested meaning). Why? Because the consequence of choosing to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable. In other words...the more one consent to stand under the suggested choices of others; the less one comprehends to be the center of perceivable balance.
Understanding represents "standing under" suggested information. The origin of standing under the suggested information by others represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which tempts one to ignore that choice represents the responding center of perceivable balance (need/want). The latter (balance to choice) represents natural law as defined by the natural order (flow to form) for the resulting form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Being moved represents being within the "simple way"; ignoring this for trying to stand under suggestions makes it "complex".
Because you suggest information that contradict the suggested information they already consented to. They are bound within contract law with a 3rd party; while viewing your suggestions as an opposition to it.
They neither comprehend the 3rd party (parasitic suggestions); the contract law (consent to suggested); nor the origin of the conflict with you (reasoning about suggested meaning). Why? Because the consequence of choosing to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable. In other words...the more one consent to stand under the suggested choices of others; the less one comprehends to be the center of perceivable balance.