Men becoming pregnant and having abortions represents the suggestion of the few.
Wanting or not wanting it represents the consent of the many.
Wanting versus not wanting it represents the resulting conflict of reason among the many.
Men "can" become... represents the deliberate contradiction of reason (aka talmudic reasoning) as to keep the conflict going.
The topic of the initial suggestion is irrelevant; a replaceable sales-pitch to tempt others to consent to reasoning (division through suggestion). I could suggest "women should be called wo, to finally free themselves of the patriarchy". If the reach of this suggestion is wide enough then that many will be busy reasoning themselves to death; which I then can prolong with a contradiction like "wo stands for womb; which implies being subjugated to the process of breeding".
This all represents the exploitation of wanting confirmation and not wanting contradiction through the offer of suggestion. The few simply keep feeding their cattle what they want or not want to keep them in ignorance of need.
Why is it so tempting for life (temporary) to suggest the proclamation of "ever" (ongoing) to others?
worst
Worst (not want) vs best (want) both represent consent to suggestion (want); over perception (need).
worst bot ever
If it's the worst bot forever (forever ever? forever ever!); then wouldn't that imply that technology cannot make things worse? Have you recently observed any examples of suggested technology being used to systematically make things worse for those using it?
Men becoming pregnant and having abortions represents the suggestion of the few.
Wanting or not wanting it represents the consent of the many.
Wanting versus not wanting it represents the resulting conflict of reason among the many.
Men "can" become... represents the deliberate contradiction of reason (aka talmudic reasoning) as to keep the conflict going.
The topic of the initial suggestion is irrelevant; a replaceable sales-pitch to tempt others to consent to reasoning (division through suggestion). I could suggest "women should be called wo, to finally free themselves of the patriarchy". If the reach of this suggestion is wide enough then that many will be busy reasoning themselves to death; which I then can prolong with a contradiction like "wo stands for womb; which implies being subjugated to the process of breeding".
This all represents the exploitation of wanting confirmation and not wanting contradiction through the offer of suggestion. The few simply keep feeding their cattle what they want or not want to keep them in ignorance of need.
Worst bot ever
Why is it so tempting for life (temporary) to suggest the proclamation of "ever" (ongoing) to others?
Worst (not want) vs best (want) both represent consent to suggestion (want); over perception (need).
If it's the worst bot forever (forever ever? forever ever!); then wouldn't that imply that technology cannot make things worse? Have you recently observed any examples of suggested technology being used to systematically make things worse for those using it?