IDEN'TITY, noun - "sameness" ignores that form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents differentiation (form) out of sameness (flow). The parasitic few suggest the many "identities" to tempt them to ignore being different.
Everything perceivable represents moving differences; sameness doesn't exist within perceivable differences. The few industrialized the manufacturing of "alike" differences to trick the many to consent to being the same; being chain of command order followers; NPC's; subjugated under the party-line; following the mainstream; lemmings; followers under leaders etc.
Take any two things you think are the same. Now notice that for you to be able to perceive them; they have to exist at different places. They represent differences shaped alike to fool you into ignoring differences for sameness. Moving differences towards perceiving senses represents nature communicating inspiration for adaptation.
We are not dealing with stupid people, we are seeing mentally ill people. We need take a firm stand against sick people trying to set standards. This is driven by the people who want to destroy society through making it have insane beliefs. In a sane world, we would seek out the leaders who are pushing this and help them push up daisies instead.
Men becoming pregnant and having abortions represents the suggestion of the few.
Wanting or not wanting it represents the consent of the many.
Wanting versus not wanting it represents the resulting conflict of reason among the many.
Men "can" become... represents the deliberate contradiction of reason (aka talmudic reasoning) as to keep the conflict going.
The topic of the initial suggestion is irrelevant; a replaceable sales-pitch to tempt others to consent to reasoning (division through suggestion). I could suggest "women should be called wo, to finally free themselves of the patriarchy". If the reach of this suggestion is wide enough then that many will be busy reasoning themselves to death; which I then can prolong with a contradiction like "wo stands for womb; which implies being subjugated to the process of breeding".
This all represents the exploitation of wanting confirmation and not wanting contradiction through the offer of suggestion. The few simply keep feeding their cattle what they want or not want to keep them in ignorance of need.
Why is it so tempting for life (temporary) to suggest the proclamation of "ever" (ongoing) to others?
worst
Worst (not want) vs best (want) both represent consent to suggestion (want); over perception (need).
worst bot ever
If it's the worst bot forever (forever ever? forever ever!); then wouldn't that imply that technology cannot make things worse? Have you recently observed any examples of suggested technology being used to systematically make things worse for those using it?
I can play along. Today I identify as a toaster oven. Now I demand free pop tarts! If I don't get my free poptarts, everyone is a racist, damnit!
IDEN'TITY, noun - "sameness" ignores that form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents differentiation (form) out of sameness (flow). The parasitic few suggest the many "identities" to tempt them to ignore being different.
Everything perceivable represents moving differences; sameness doesn't exist within perceivable differences. The few industrialized the manufacturing of "alike" differences to trick the many to consent to being the same; being chain of command order followers; NPC's; subjugated under the party-line; following the mainstream; lemmings; followers under leaders etc.
Take any two things you think are the same. Now notice that for you to be able to perceive them; they have to exist at different places. They represent differences shaped alike to fool you into ignoring differences for sameness. Moving differences towards perceiving senses represents nature communicating inspiration for adaptation.
We are not dealing with stupid people, we are seeing mentally ill people. We need take a firm stand against sick people trying to set standards. This is driven by the people who want to destroy society through making it have insane beliefs. In a sane world, we would seek out the leaders who are pushing this and help them push up daisies instead.
Ask them if a white can identify as black.
Call a deer a horse.
https://laowai-dawei.com/calling-a-deer-a-horse-%E6%8C%87%E9%B9%BF%E4%B8%BA%E9%A9%AC/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CCalling%20a%20deer%20a%20horse%E2%80%9D%20means%20to%20deceive,this%20four%20word%20Chinese%20idiom%2C%20a%20%E6%88%90%E8%AF%AD%20ch%C3%A9ngy%C7%94.
Men becoming pregnant and having abortions represents the suggestion of the few.
Wanting or not wanting it represents the consent of the many.
Wanting versus not wanting it represents the resulting conflict of reason among the many.
Men "can" become... represents the deliberate contradiction of reason (aka talmudic reasoning) as to keep the conflict going.
The topic of the initial suggestion is irrelevant; a replaceable sales-pitch to tempt others to consent to reasoning (division through suggestion). I could suggest "women should be called wo, to finally free themselves of the patriarchy". If the reach of this suggestion is wide enough then that many will be busy reasoning themselves to death; which I then can prolong with a contradiction like "wo stands for womb; which implies being subjugated to the process of breeding".
This all represents the exploitation of wanting confirmation and not wanting contradiction through the offer of suggestion. The few simply keep feeding their cattle what they want or not want to keep them in ignorance of need.
Worst bot ever
Why is it so tempting for life (temporary) to suggest the proclamation of "ever" (ongoing) to others?
Worst (not want) vs best (want) both represent consent to suggestion (want); over perception (need).
If it's the worst bot forever (forever ever? forever ever!); then wouldn't that imply that technology cannot make things worse? Have you recently observed any examples of suggested technology being used to systematically make things worse for those using it?