Doesn't it make a lot of sense when you consider Kotaku and Buzzfeed post intentional rage inducing click bait for attention in a failing market space. If you want to get the most rage clicks you need a network to spread your articles and create a fake grass roots movement to do it. Wouldn't places like KIA or /v/ be the perfect place to post your fake cup head tutorial video or 'why killing white babies is okay' articles? Doesn't matter if you believe what the content is saying, it just matters you get eyes on it. So for failed journalists becoming moderators (I'm not pointing any fingers here so we're clear) or admins of communities designed to repost your low quality bait makes sense. Same way any time you look into grass roots activism it's always funded by large corps or political agencies. It's never actual grass root responses to things.
Communities like Kotaku in action are run by failed journalists hyping their own click bait articles
I'm sorry. The only Kotaku in Action I know is:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2
Then you have said nothing, and your words hold no value.
Can a word hold value; when the choice used to suggest it represents the evaluation of perceivable value?
Value, a concept used to articulate preference representing choice
:)
a) RE (response to) PRESENT (presented), hence as choice (evaluation) to balance (value). Choice represents a reaction to an enacted balance (need/want aka sustenance of life(temptation luring towards death).
b) CONCEP (formed) -TION (through action)...form (life) represents the reaction to enacted flow (inception towards death). Hence...evaluation (choice) represents the concept of value (balance).
c) ARTI (artificial; hence in response to natural) CUL (cultivated; formed) -ATION (through action). As form within flow; one represents the articulated reaction to the articulating nature.
d) suggested preference by choice ignores that "pre" (before) choice comes perceived balance to choose within.
e) evaluation (choice of perceiving) can only exist within value (perceivable balance); yet choice allows to ignore this for evaluating the suggested choices by others as value; while de-valuating their choice of evaluation.
f) what's the value in articulating the preference to not breathe? If you're forced to breathe; then your evaluating choice is subjected to a balance (need to breathe/ want to not breathe).