36
(O.o) (media.scored.co)
posted ago by pkvi ago by pkvi +40 / -4
Comments (39)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Gemmaugr 3 points ago +3 / -0

DDG? really? That censoring microsoft bing-front can go take a hike.

https://private.sh/

1
pkvi [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Said "even" DDG which is shit bcz of Bing but to be fair, Bing still brings up better results than other compromised ones.

https://metager.org/

2
Gemmaugr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Metager is also bing (microsoft) you know..plus, it only works on chrome (google) browsers..way to go Big Tech!

0
pkvi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Metager is actually three aggregates. Bing is one.

Did not know it only works on Chromium and that's fine by me.. Mozilla engines can go fuck a long stick.

1
Gemmaugr 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't use either evil google chrome or woke firefox. I use Pale Moon.

0
pkvi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just tested the link you suggested with my benchmark and it suuuccckkksss. No thank you.

Want a simple benchmark to test --> type my user id "pkvi" on different search engines. You'd be surprised how (not Indian) unique it is. If conspiracies.win or some other personal sites don't pop up on the first page and its already adjusting with changes in spelling, the engine sucks.

1
Gemmaugr 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's an asinine benchmark, not all crawlers are as fast or as big as google or microsoft, but that doesn't mean they can't deliver good results.

Have some others:

https://search.brave.com/

http://gigablast.com/

https://www.alexandria.org/

https://www.mojeek.com/

0
pkvi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Brave is absolute garbage.

deliver good results

That is literally what a search engine exists for. WTF are talking about?! It crawls the internet, catalogs all the meta data.. then delivers the results uncensored relative to your search. Its not rocket science --> the goal for a good one is to prove they don't reduce results

1
Gemmaugr 1 point ago +1 / -0

This shows you don't know what you're talking about. Brave's results are very similar to microsoft bing's. Because those who first made Tailcat designed it in such a way. Many have also remarked upon its similarities. But any excuse to keep using google and microsoft I guess. You can call it convenience, but it keeps them in control.

Btw, metager may use other sources, but none compare to bing's inclusion. It delivers the most results in that list, because it's the biggest.

0
pkvi [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

protects your privacy

What a bull shit statement from search engines. Ayh don't trust ones that say that. Its not the issue we have with search engines.. its about NOT censoring results and this act like we care about search privacy is a scam.

1
Gemmaugr 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should care about both. Without one we won't have the other, in the end.