The parameters they set for who was a mule was going to ten drop boxes, and trips to at least one organization that was distributing ballots. There was video backing up that they were dropping off ballots in many cases. Whistle blowers backed up that this had happened, that they had participated. As for lawsuits, there were lawsuits that were dismissed.
The biggest case was dismissed by the supreme court without hearing any evidence, but it's my understanding that they would have presented similar evidence.
When you watched it, what was the most compelling evidence that was presented? Do they explain why nobody has yet brought it into a lawsuit?
The cell phone data and video footage.
They didn’t have the data yet. It took time to figure out what they did.
Is that data available online somewhere?
They’re going to be releasing it.
The parameters they set for who was a mule was going to ten drop boxes, and trips to at least one organization that was distributing ballots. There was video backing up that they were dropping off ballots in many cases. Whistle blowers backed up that this had happened, that they had participated. As for lawsuits, there were lawsuits that were dismissed.
Did any lawsuit present the evidence shown in the movie?
The biggest case was dismissed by the supreme court without hearing any evidence, but it's my understanding that they would have presented similar evidence.
In none of the cases did anyone claim election fraud.
Any idea why nobody filed a case claiming election fraud when there is so much evidence for it?
The case wasn't granted cert, so it wasn't heard. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/writ_of_certiorari