The idea I'm attempting to propose is that this is now becoming you don't have a choice for your body.
The idea of my body my choice was nice but then why did you have sex?
We can slowly see the conundrum.
I do believe in my body my choice. Sex can result in grossness from a humanbeing like bacteria and other grossness.
I want to know at this point how much the government should have control over your actions or your body. I do think to some certain extent it should but, if my government is corrupt, I have no ability to correct it other then "voting". I could take the violence route but I am getting monitored for that.
I am wondering why roe v wade right now. Specifically after the whole covid fiasco.
Though it feels nice to rub in the faces of those who believed in "my body my choice
I however think there is malicious ideas behind it.
I'd propose the idea that we preach equality for different people. This idea has worked well for me recently based off of one experiment. The word equality gets their emotions going.
"I am wondering why roe v wade right now. Specifically after the whole covid fiasco."
The decision was leaked to mobilize the Dems prior to the election. But the pro-life movement has pushed and pushed and pushed, at the state and local level, in GOP primaries to get pro-life candidates elected, for 50 years (since Roe in 1973). They got the strongest pro-life president ever in Trump, who appointed 3 Federalist Society justices who, while namby-pamby on a host of issues, the Federalist Society is strongly pro-life.
It wasn't a coincidence, but the result of hard work.
Likewise, since the 1960s the left did the same for gay marriage. Obergerfell was not an accident, but a result of their hard work doing the same as the pro-life crowd.
obergerfell reminds me slightly of this, done in 2015, roles up conservatives, trump wins a year later. this abortion ending one will rule up liberals, maybe to help them win midterm elections.
Seems weird, conservative justices want to help dems and liberal justices helped trump? It's one party and they want support to be 50-50%.
I don't think this is conservative justices wanting to help Dems win midterms. The Court can only decide cases put before it, and they have zero control over the timing of when they do. You'd have to say they planned this out almost two years ago when they voted to grant cert to hear it. And in America, there are always elections every two years.