Sunspot cycles - anybody up on this stuff know what a lot of sunspots mean?
(behindtheblack.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Well, for example, we know that Jupiter/Io have a relationship that causes Jupiter to spit out a bunch of EMF with a periodicity that exactly matches the orbital dynamics if this iron core moon. Sun is a bit more collocated because of its size, the distances, and its Corona. I'm totally speculating here but perhaps changes to Corona occur from planets (known phenomenon) can also in turn cause a change to sunspots.
There are magnetically charged paths between planets that modulate flare outbursts.
As planets move, the magnetic tubes move.
By late 2024 earth and the tubes will cross four times.
Enough time for more than a close call with an x10+ flare.
Loaded question, the meaning of lots of sunspots is not something anyone can provide you, the meaning here would imply someone can explain why they are there and what causes more over less.
Generally the cycle moves from low to high then back again. When we are in a low output cycle activity on the sun is diminished with respect to a high part of the cycle.
Currently the warmists only register irradiance from the sun, this leads us to a situation where on the planet we decree the sun moving between low and high outputs has no significant impact on the planets climate.
However, science studies are now assembling a broader understanding on the impact the sun has on pressure systems within our weather systems that does indeed play a significant role on the planets climate.
When the sun is in a low output state, there is much more cosmic radiation in our analysis, compared to when it is in a high output state, we see much more solar radiation.
I don't think we have any evidence showing sun spots creating warmer weather?
Yea, they openly declare there is no direct correlation in that writing. We do not have the capability to unravel this currently, imo.
I suspect as time continues we will develop a better understanding. There is certainly a relationship to the solar output of the sun and the planetary state, but do sunspots drive anything? or are they just a common feature type thing.
When we examine a given sunspot and its projected matter, we are not really in a position to translate that to a direct understanding.
I am clearly posing it as a question, the correct response is, yes we do not have any usable evidence proving such a claim.
The reality is that the sun has much more output than we measure, the impact of the sun on the climate is a reality, but we cannot easily explain the fluctuations we see given our methods of analysis.
So, what I am implying is that it is unlikely the sun spots cause a change in the planets temperature.
A good example of this is the strength of our magnetic field being tied to the sun's state via the interplanetary magnetic field. As we see a reduction in the strength of the magnetic field, we can expect changes with respect to radiation and other matter entering the atmosphere, as one such possibility for something happening which we cannot easily explain and prove using our tools.
You are a nice type of fella eh?
There is no backtrack, perhaps your reading comprehension is lacking.
Your claim that sunspots change the planets temperature being proven via a historical reference to planetary temperature change during a long period of low solar activity is lacking.
If you had instead said, that the low state of the solar output visible during periods of low sun spot counting indicates that the planets temperature drops has been noted, then you would have been correct.
To imply that the sun spots are causing a change in the planets temperature at all is short sighted and not well founded.
What is well founded is that there are other relationships that are in reference to the state of the solar output of the sun that indicate changes in the planets climate.