Return of the Luddites - The third wave.
This is our last chance before confining ourselves to a digital prison
(thegreatreject.substack.com)
Discussion
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
a) following Luddism against (death to machines) implies consenting to suggestion beforehand; which is what causes the machines.
b) the parasitic few who exploit the ignorance among the many of perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information), also suggest the outcome for what they're suggesting (sleight of hand; reveal of method; notice of liability). In this case (machines) it's the Butlerian Jihad (crusade against thinking machines). The luddite movement already was one attempt at the Butlerian Jihad.
c) CHANCE; noun - "the effect of an unknown cause" ignores that knowledge (perception) represents the communicating cause (balance of motion) for the perceiving effect (formed choice) at its center.
So, are you saying that we should be spreading knowledge to have the desired effect?
Perception represents knowledge communicated through ongoing motion; adaptation to it grows ones comprehension of the perceived; hence comprehending the infinite knowledge around oneself. It's the resulting growth that represents the spread of inspiration for adaptation.
The desire of spreading represents the want to suggest information; which a) implies the ignorance of needed inspiration and b) is what is being parasitically exploited; through for example machines suggesting endless information for consenting users to think about.
We cannot spread knowledge...we are tempting everyone around us to stand under (understanding) suggested information; while ignoring to be the ONEs within ALL perceivable inspiration (knowledge communicated as moving inspiration).
You are the effect of an ongoing system aka the reaction (choice) to action (balance); yet we're tricked to ignore it for the suggestions of each other; spearheaded by the parasitic few industrializing suggestion (want over need) to keep the many in ignorance of perception (need over want).
Look at your PC...what are you ignoring when desiring "death to the machines"? You're consenting to the suggestion of it; you're being tempted by it; you are tempted to justify the consequences of your consent aka falling for temptations, by blaming "it". You're defined by the suggested "it"; while ignoring the perceived PERSON (per sonos -"by sound") COMPUTE (to think). You are the personal computer; unless ignored for the suggested PC.
Is the sky yellow?
Those who're perceiving cannot define what they're perceiving; since perception implies response to already preexisting. You are tricked to reason about suggested labels (sky; yellow) and depending on choice sky can be black; blue; a convenience store and if I piss high enough...even yellow.
In other words...a suggestion cannot define what is; since it was shaped out of already perceivable.