What's the difference between comprehending the perceivable origin and standing under (understanding) the suggested explanations about the origin?
The Goal Of Life
What if life being isn't outcome oriented (death); but a response to perceived origin for the prolonged sustenance of temporary life?
if You Want
What if the choice of want represents the choice to ignore need?
To Help The World
If everything within the "world" represents a response (choice) to it; then doesn't that imply that the natural order of this world is balance based; hence those within representing the responding choice?
Not in the mind (memory) of those consenting to the suggested globe. The consequences of their choices represent the shared circumstances for everyone else. In other words...opposing fake doesn't prevent others to respond as if real.
What's the difference between comprehending the perceivable origin and standing under (understanding) the suggested explanations about the origin?
What if life being isn't outcome oriented (death); but a response to perceived origin for the prolonged sustenance of temporary life?
What if the choice of want represents the choice to ignore need?
If everything within the "world" represents a response (choice) to it; then doesn't that imply that the natural order of this world is balance based; hence those within representing the responding choice?
the globe is fake to begin with
Not in the mind (memory) of those consenting to the suggested globe. The consequences of their choices represent the shared circumstances for everyone else. In other words...opposing fake doesn't prevent others to respond as if real.